Value
8.6/10data confidence 20%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 8.6 |
- ▸Attractively valued
RA · Why this verdict
Why Brookfield Real Assets Income F (RA) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund screens as a low-quality, thinly covered asset-management vehicle with an unsafe yield and a downtrend, with nothing in the data to support adding exposure beyond a modest P/E.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Business quality is very weak at 0.9/10, below the 4.0 floor, with a Piotroski F-Score of 0/9 and no competitive moat. Quality breakdown | The F-Score improves to at least 4 and the quality score moves above 4.0 within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterAs a fund-style vehicle its margins and F-Score inputs may be structurally distorted, so low quality scores may overstate operating weakness, but the data gives no sign of improvement. | ||
The high yield is flagged as unsafe, with dividend safety at 2.0/10 and a yield-trap warning. Catalyst breakdown | Dividend safety rises above 5/10 with distributions covered by earnings over 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterDistribution coverage data is limited with low confidence, so the yield could prove more durable, but a cut would remove the main reason to hold the fund. | ||
Price momentum is weak at 3.5/10 with falling on-balance volume, a price below its 200-day average and a death cross. Momentum breakdown | Price reclaims its 200-day average and volume turns to accumulation. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe 200-day average slope is flat and MACD is improving, so the chart may be bottoming, although the volume trend does not confirm it. | ||
Take-profit sits at $11.81 from a $11.60 price, just 1.8% upside against 3.1% downside to the $11.24 stop, with no analyst target available. Upside pct | Price breaks above the $11.81 resistance level and builds a higher range. | →Stable |
| CounterWith risk exceeding reward and no analyst coverage to support a higher target, the setup offers little compensation for the risks flagged. | ||
The fund is rated attractively valued on its price-to-earnings multiple, scoring 8.6/10 on that measure. Valuation breakdown | Earnings remain stable so the valuation score stays above 7/10. | →Stable |
| CounterValue confidence is only 0.2 because few valuation inputs are available, so the apparent cheapness is a weak signal. | ||
Business quality is very weak at 0.9/10, below the 4.0 floor, with a Piotroski F-Score of 0/9 and no competitive moat.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- The F-Score improves to at least 4 and the quality score moves above 4.0 within 12 months.
CounterAs a fund-style vehicle its margins and F-Score inputs may be structurally distorted, so low quality scores may overstate operating weakness, but the data gives no sign of improvement.
The high yield is flagged as unsafe, with dividend safety at 2.0/10 and a yield-trap warning.
→StableCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- Dividend safety rises above 5/10 with distributions covered by earnings over 12 months.
CounterDistribution coverage data is limited with low confidence, so the yield could prove more durable, but a cut would remove the main reason to hold the fund.
Price momentum is weak at 3.5/10 with falling on-balance volume, a price below its 200-day average and a death cross.
↓DeterioratingMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- Price reclaims its 200-day average and volume turns to accumulation.
CounterThe 200-day average slope is flat and MACD is improving, so the chart may be bottoming, although the volume trend does not confirm it.
Take-profit sits at $11.81 from a $11.60 price, just 1.8% upside against 3.1% downside to the $11.24 stop, with no analyst target available.
→StableUpside pct
- Expectation
- Price breaks above the $11.81 resistance level and builds a higher range.
CounterWith risk exceeding reward and no analyst coverage to support a higher target, the setup offers little compensation for the risks flagged.
The fund is rated attractively valued on its price-to-earnings multiple, scoring 8.6/10 on that measure.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- Earnings remain stable so the valuation score stays above 7/10.
CounterValue confidence is only 0.2 because few valuation inputs are available, so the apparent cheapness is a weak signal.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
0.9/10data confidence 71%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.5 |
| Piotroski F | 0.0 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Weak Piotroski F-Score: 0/9
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
5.0/10data confidence 50%Momentum
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 6.6 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.5 |
| Volume | 1.3 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope flat
Sentiment
5.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
Insider
5.8/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 6.5 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
4.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.3 |
| quality rank | 5.0 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
Technical
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.4 |
| support resistance | 5.7 |
| 52w position | 8.4 |
Risk (lower is worse)
9.6/10data confidence 40%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 9.1 |
Catalyst
2.0/10data confidence 25%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| dividend safety | 2.0 |
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:NO_DATE
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:3.6<4.5
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (1)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 58
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.6B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.6B<$5B
Investment implication
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 3.6<4.5 outcome against Risk (lower is worse) at 9.6 and asymmetric R:R of 0.00.
The strongest dimensions are Risk (lower is worse) at 9.6, Value at 8.6, and Insider at 5.8; the weakest are Quality at 0.9, Catalyst at 2.0, and Momentum at 3.6. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Weak Quality Profile
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score stays below 3 out of 9 for 2 consecutive reports.
- P2Unsafe Distribution Yield
Trip ifDistribution cut exceeds 20% from the current rate.
- P3Downtrend With Weak Volume
Trip ifPrice falls below the $11.24 stop level.
- P4Limited Upside To Resistance
Trip ifPrice rises above $11.81 resistance on volume above its 50-day average.
- P5Modest Earnings Multiple
Trip ifTrailing P/E rises above 15x as earnings fall.