Skip to main content
PAYSPaysign, Inc.Buy Wait6.0·$14.09
PAYS · Why this verdict

Why Paysign (PAYS) is rated BUY WAIT

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score6.0/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Paysign is a high-quality, fast-growing payments business with a wide moat and cheap growth-adjusted valuation, but the price is above the analyst target, insiders are heavy sellers and earnings surprises have been uneven.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Quarterly revenue reached about $28.25M versus about $19.08M a year earlier, roughly 48% YoY growth, with next-quarter consensus near $29.0M.

→Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Revenue growth stays above 25% YoY across the next four quarters.

CounterRevenue was nearly flat sequentially ($28.04M to $28.25M), so growth may be decelerating, and the growth score carries only 0.33 confidence.

Quality notes cite an excellent ROE of 31%, strong margins of 16%, a wide economic moat and a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
ROE stays above 20% and margins above 12% while the moat holds.

CounterROA scores only 2.9/10 and FCF quality 6.5/10, so ROE may be flattered by balance-sheet structure rather than operating strength.

At $14.92 the stock is above the $12.27 analyst target (upside of -17.8%), so there is no stated upside despite a PEG of 0.25 on a forward P/E of 24.3x.

↑Improving
Upside pct
Expectation
Either analysts raise targets as growth continues or the price consolidates toward the target over 12 months.

CounterA PEG of 0.25 suggests the target lags growth, and analysts may be slow to update for a rapidly growing small cap.

Insiders sold about $6.09M over 90 days across 8 sales with zero buys, equal to 0.723% of market cap and rated extreme severity.

→Stable
Insider
Expectation
Insider selling continues without offsetting open-market buys over the next 12 months.

CounterSelling may reflect planned diversification by long-tenured holders after a strong run, with no signal about the business.

Over the last 4 quarters Paysign recorded 1 beat, 2 inline results and 1 miss with an average surprise of -14.1%, though August beat at $0.10 versus $0.08.

→Stable
Earnings
Expectation
EPS beats consensus in the report due in 16 days and stays at or above estimates afterward.

CounterPer-share amounts are tiny, so small dollar differences produce large percentage surprises that overstate how unreliable results are.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E2.4
P/S4.9
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E5.7
PEG10.0
Analyst target3.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 22.7x
  • ▸PEG: 0.24

Quality

7.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE10.0
ROA2.9
Gross margin8.2
Op margin10.0
Net margin7.8
Current ratio4.4
FCF quality6.5
Moat9.0
Piotroski F8.9
  • ▸Excellent ROE: 31%
  • ▸Strong margins: 16%
  • ▸Wide economic moat
  • ▸Compounder quality: strong returns + growth

Growth

10.0/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth10.0
  • ▸Strong growth: 48% YoY

Momentum

2.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI7.7
MACD0.0
OBV1.0
MA position6.0
Volume0.0
  • ▸Uptrend pullback (RSI 38) - buy opportunity
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target5.0
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

3.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality2.0
insider conviction2.0
holder change6.5
notable moves5.0
  • ▸Heavy insider selling — $5,625,453 (0.713% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

6.5/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.9
quality rank7.3
growth rank9.1
  • ▸Industry growth leader

Technical

7.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger9.0
support resistance8.0
52w position7.4
gap5.0

Risk (lower is worse)

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.2
days to cover7.8
volatility0.0
put call6.0
implied vol0.0
max pain risk7.0
beta8.0
debt equity9.6
  • ▸High IV: 107%

Catalyst

3.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
  • ▸Earnings in 11 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Growth is cheap relative to earnings, but the technical setup has not yet produced a breakout above resistance (PEG 0.24, quality 7.5/10, growth 10.0/10).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_C2_GARP_WAIT|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BAND
Passed (4)
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
  • MOMENTUM:2.9<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.1=NEGATIVE
  • INSIDER:0.71%=EXTREME
Warning (1)
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:11d<=14d (soft)
Reward-to-Risk
-1.11
Upside
-12.9%
Downside
11.6%
Sizing output
STARTER

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeTemporary headwind — High quality (7.5) with weak momentum (2.9)

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.8B<$5B

Investment implication

The C-path quality+growth combination triggered the STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict: quality 7.5 and growth 10.0 both clear their thresholds, with asymmetric R:R of -1.11 supporting the read.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Quality at 7.5, and Technical at 7.3; the weakest are Momentum at 2.9, Catalyst at 3.3, and Insider at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.11 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Rapid Revenue Growth

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue growth falls below 25% YoY from roughly 48% currently.

  • P2High Quality Wide Moat

    Trip ifROE falls below 20% from current 31%.

  • P3Price Above Analyst Target

    Trip ifAnalyst target rises above $16, more than 7% above the current $14.92 price.

  • P4Heavy Insider Selling

    Trip ifInsider open-market buying exceeds $1M in a 90-day window, or 90-day selling falls below 0.2% of market cap.

  • P5Uneven Earnings Surprises

    Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 0% for 3 consecutive quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › PAYS › Why this verdict