Value
4.7/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 6.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.8 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Pacific Biosciences shows a perfect recent earnings beat streak and analyst-projected upside, but persistent cash burn below the quality floor and heavy bearish positioning in a volatile stock temper the case for near-term conviction.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality sits at 2.8, below the engine's 4.0 floor, driven by cash burn of -30% of revenue and the absence of a competitive moat. Quality breakdown | FCF as a percentage of revenue should improve to better than -15% and quality score should rise above 4.0 over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA genomics-sequencing hardware company burning cash at this rate may need dilutive financing before profitability improves, worsening rather than resolving the quality gap. | ||
The company has beaten consensus EPS estimates in all of the last 4 quarters, with an average surprise of roughly 14%. Catalyst breakdown | The beat streak should continue for at least 3 of the next 4 quarters. | ↑Improving |
| CounterConsistent beats against a backdrop of heavy cash burn and no moat could reflect deliberately conservative guidance rather than genuine operating improvement. | ||
Analysts see 46% upside to target, though coverage is light (6 analysts), which the model flags as a dampened signal. Sentiment breakdown | Analyst price targets should hold or rise, and coverage breadth should increase, over the next 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterLight analyst coverage means the 46% upside figure rests on a small sample and could be revised sharply if even one analyst downgrades. | ||
Short interest of 22% and implied volatility of 135% point to significant bearish positioning and expected price swings. Key risks | Short interest should decline below 15% and implied volatility should moderate below 100% over the next 12 months. | ↑Improving |
| CounterExtremely high short interest combined with a strong earnings beat streak could instead set up a short squeeze rather than confirming the bearish thesis. | ||
The stock trades below its 200-day moving average, but that average is still rising (+1.4% over 30 days), consistent with a pullback within an uptrend. Momentum breakdown | Price should reclaim the 200-day moving average within 12 months while the average continues to trend up. | ↑Improving |
| CounterA rising average with price below it can also mark the early stage of a downtrend, especially for a cash-burning company with no moat. | ||
CounterA genomics-sequencing hardware company burning cash at this rate may need dilutive financing before profitability improves, worsening rather than resolving the quality gap.
CounterConsistent beats against a backdrop of heavy cash burn and no moat could reflect deliberately conservative guidance rather than genuine operating improvement.
CounterLight analyst coverage means the 46% upside figure rests on a small sample and could be revised sharply if even one analyst downgrades.
CounterExtremely high short interest combined with a strong earnings beat streak could instead set up a short squeeze rather than confirming the bearish thesis.
CounterA rising average with price below it can also mark the early stage of a downtrend, especially for a cash-burning company with no moat.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 6.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.8 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 1.9 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 8.1 |
| Moat | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 2.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 7.1 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 8.0 |
| Volume | 9.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.0 |
| Analyst rating | 6.7 |
| Price target | 3.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 3.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 6.5 |
| notable moves | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.0 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 0.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.8 |
| support resistance | 3.5 |
| 52w position | 6.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 1.8 |
| days to cover | 8.3 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 2.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 5.5 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORSetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 64, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 2.19>1.3, MCap $0.9B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's -1.5=NEGATIVE outcome against Momentum at 8.0 and asymmetric R:R of -1.46.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 8.0, Catalyst at 6.0, and Sentiment at 5.2; the weakest are Growth at 2.0, Peer rank at 2.1, and Quality at 2.5. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.46 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFCF as a percentage of revenue falls below -40%.
Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifAverage analyst price target falls by more than 20%.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 35% of float.
Trip ifPrice falls more than 15% below the 200-day moving average.