Value
7.5/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 11.4x
- ▸PEG: 0.05
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The stock trades at a forward P/E of 11.6x with a PEG ratio of just 0.05, suggesting the market may be underpricing the company's earnings growth relative to peers. Valuation breakdown | Forward P/E should stay below 15x and PEG should remain under 1.0 over the next 12 months, confirming the valuation gap holds. | →Stable |
| CounterSuch a low PEG alongside declining revenue growth suggests the growth estimate feeding the ratio may not be durable. | ||
Quality sits at 3.1 (below the engine's 4.0 floor), driven by thin FCF margins (1%) and the absence of a competitive moat, despite the company remaining FCF-positive. Quality breakdown | Quality score should recover above 4.0 and FCF margin should expand above 3% over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThin margins and no moat in apparel retail tend to be structural rather than cyclical, making a quick recovery unlikely. | ||
The company has beaten consensus estimates in 3 of its last 4 quarters, a catalyst that has historically supported the stock despite otherwise weak quality metrics. Earnings | The company should continue beating consensus EPS estimates in at least 3 of the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterA beat streak built on conservative guidance rather than genuine demand strength could reverse quickly, especially with weak momentum heading into the next print. | ||
Momentum failed the engine's gate at 2.1 (below the 4.5 bar), with the stock below its 200-day moving average and a flat moving-average slope. Engine gate (failed) | Momentum score should recover above 4.5 and price should reclaim the 200-day moving average within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterPersistently weak momentum combined with high short interest (32%) could be an early warning of further downside. | ||
High short interest (32%), an elevated put/call ratio of 6.25, and high implied volatility (78%) point to substantial bearish positioning and expected price swings. Risk breakdown | Short interest should decline below 20% and the put/call ratio should normalize below 2.0 over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterElevated short interest could instead set up a short squeeze if an earnings beat forces bears to cover. | ||
CounterSuch a low PEG alongside declining revenue growth suggests the growth estimate feeding the ratio may not be durable.
CounterThin margins and no moat in apparel retail tend to be structural rather than cyclical, making a quick recovery unlikely.
CounterA beat streak built on conservative guidance rather than genuine demand strength could reverse quickly, especially with weak momentum heading into the next print.
CounterPersistently weak momentum combined with high short interest (32%) could be an early warning of further downside.
CounterElevated short interest could instead set up a short squeeze if an earnings beat forces bears to cover.
Oxford Industries trades at an attractive valuation with a strong recent earnings beat streak, but weak momentum, no competitive moat, and heavy bearish options positioning suggest the market has already priced in most of the company's near-term quality concerns.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.2 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.1 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.6 |
| Gross margin | 8.0 |
| Op margin | 2.3 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.5 |
| FCF quality | 3.2 |
| Moat | 4.0 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.4 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 6.9 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.5 |
| Volume | 2.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.0 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 6.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.5 |
| holder change | 9.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 9.3 |
| quality rank | 1.4 |
| growth rank | 2.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.3 |
| support resistance | 8.7 |
| 52w position | 3.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 0.3 |
| days to cover | 3.5 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 3.3 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 6.8 |
| debt equity | 4.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 7.0 |
| news activity | 6.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 46 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.5B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 7.5 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.3<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.5, Insider at 7.5, and Growth at 6.2; the weakest are Risk (lower is worse) at 2.7, Quality at 3.1, and Momentum at 3.3. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.39 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 20x without a corresponding earnings increase.
Trip ifQuality score falls below 2.5 or FCF margin falls below 0%.
Trip ifMomentum score stays below 3.0 for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 40% of float.
Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.