Value
7.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.4 |
| P/S | 6.1 |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.7 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 12.9x
- ▸PEG: 0.15
- ▸Attractively valued
OIG · Why this verdict
Why Orion180 Insurance Group (OIG) is rated BUY WAIT
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score7.1/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Orion180 Insurance Group shows strong growth (56% YoY), solid margins and a 7/9 Piotroski score, but no price was available this run and operating margin of -114.5% with D/E 3.1 raises value-trap concerns.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Growth is strong at 56% YoY, earning a growth score of 10.0 and an industry growth leader flag. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should stay above 30% YoY over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterGrowth confidence is only 0.33, and a small insurer can post high growth off a tiny base that does not persist. | ||
The business is rated high quality with strong margins of 21% and a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, for a quality score of 8.1. Quality breakdown | Quality score should stay above 7.0 and the Piotroski score above 6/9. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe quality read conflicts with the -114.5% operating margin value-trap signal, so margins may not be as strong as the notes imply. | ||
Value-trap signals show 2 of 5 triggered, with operating margin at -114.5% and debt-to-equity at 3.1. Bear case | Operating margin should rise above 0% and debt-to-equity should fall below 3 within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterInsurers' leverage and operating-margin metrics are distorted by float and reserves, so the signals may overstate distress. | ||
No price was returned this run, so no entry, target or stop can be computed and the engine recommends AVOID. Warnings | A valid price should be returned in the next refresh so the setup can be assessed. | →Stable |
| CounterThe missing price is an upstream data issue rather than a company fact, so it says nothing about the fundamentals. | ||
Property and casualty insurance is classed as a binary industry, which makes the stock speculative with no clear edge. Suitability rationale | A defined edge should emerge before the speculative cap is lifted. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe binary classification is industry-wide, and a well-run underwriter can still compound reliably. | ||
Growth is strong at 56% YoY, earning a growth score of 10.0 and an industry growth leader flag.
→StableGrowth breakdown
- Expectation
- Revenue growth should stay above 30% YoY over the next 12 months.
CounterGrowth confidence is only 0.33, and a small insurer can post high growth off a tiny base that does not persist.
The business is rated high quality with strong margins of 21% and a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, for a quality score of 8.1.
↑ImprovingQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Quality score should stay above 7.0 and the Piotroski score above 6/9.
CounterThe quality read conflicts with the -114.5% operating margin value-trap signal, so margins may not be as strong as the notes imply.
Value-trap signals show 2 of 5 triggered, with operating margin at -114.5% and debt-to-equity at 3.1.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Operating margin should rise above 0% and debt-to-equity should fall below 3 within 12 months.
CounterInsurers' leverage and operating-margin metrics are distorted by float and reserves, so the signals may overstate distress.
No price was returned this run, so no entry, target or stop can be computed and the engine recommends AVOID.
→StableWarnings
- Expectation
- A valid price should be returned in the next refresh so the setup can be assessed.
CounterThe missing price is an upstream data issue rather than a company fact, so it says nothing about the fundamentals.
Property and casualty insurance is classed as a binary industry, which makes the stock speculative with no clear edge.
↑ImprovingSuitability rationale
- Expectation
- A defined edge should emerge before the speculative cap is lifted.
CounterThe binary classification is industry-wide, and a well-run underwriter can still compound reliably.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
8.3/10data confidence 86%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.0 |
| Moat | 7.0 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Strong margins: 21%
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
- ▸High-quality business
Growth
10.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 56% YoY
Momentum
6.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 6.9 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 6.5 |
| Volume | 3.5 |
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
Sentiment
7.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.5 |
| Analyst rating | 6.5 |
| Price target | 9.7 |
- ▸Light analyst coverage (5.0) — signal dampened
- ▸Analyst upside: 57%
Insider
7.5/10data confidence 75%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.5 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
- ▸Insider buying (low materiality) — $115,797 (0.012% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
5.6/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.3 |
| quality rank | 7.8 |
| growth rank | 9.5 |
- ▸Industry growth leader
Technical
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.5 |
| support resistance | 2.6 |
| 52w position | 5.8 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.0/10data confidence 40%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
Catalyst
5.0/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Growth is outpacing valuation and the technical setup has confirmed a breakout above resistance (PEG 0.15, quality 8.3/10, growth 10.0/10).
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_C2_GARP|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BANDPassed (8)
- MOMENTUM:6.3>=5.5
- ASYMMETRY:2.5>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:NO_DATE
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)
none
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
2.45
Upside
+36.8%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
STARTER
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.9B) below institutional reach
SuitabilitySpeculative — Binary industry: Insurance - Property & Casualty
Investment implication
The C-path quality+growth combination triggered the STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict: quality 8.3 and growth 10.0 both clear their thresholds, with asymmetric R:R of 2.45 supporting the read.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Quality at 8.3, and Insider at 7.5; the weakest are Technical at 3.6, Catalyst at 5.0, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.0. The V9 engine cleared all gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.45 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Strong Revenue Growth
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 20% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2High Quality Financials
Trip ifQuality score falls below 6.0 from the current 8.1.
- P3Value Trap Margin Compression
Trip ifOperating margin stays below -50% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P4Price Data Unavailable
Trip ifPrice data stays unavailable for more than 3 consecutive refreshes.
- P5Binary Industry Speculative
Trip ifDebt-to-equity exceeds 4 from the current 3.1.