Value
7.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 8.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.4 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 47.5x
- ▸PEG: 0.20
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company is cash-burning, with free cash flow at -10% of revenue, pushing its quality score below the engine's 4.0 minimum floor. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow margin turns positive, exceeding 0% of revenue, within the next several quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterFast-growing packaged-food brands often reach profitability quickly once distribution scales, so cash burn could narrow faster than the low quality score implies. | ||
Once Upon a Farm's revenue grew 44% year-over-year, driving a perfect growth score even as profitability remains a work in progress. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth stays above 20% YoY in the next two reported quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterRapid growth at a recently-scaled food brand can decelerate quickly once promotional or distribution-expansion effects fade, especially given the company is not yet profitable. | ||
Short interest sits high at 22% of float alongside a put/call ratio of 3.38 and implied volatility of 92%, all pointing to heavy bearish positioning. Risk breakdown | Short interest declines below 15% of float as bearish sentiment eases. | →Stable |
| CounterHigh short interest can also reflect informed bearish positioning ahead of a real fundamental deterioration rather than pure noise. | ||
The asymmetry ratio is negative at -0.05, since the 15% downside risk to stop-loss outweighs the -0.8% remaining upside to the price target. Reward-to-risk math | Upside to price target recovers above 10% while downside risk stays capped near current levels. | →Stable |
| CounterA re-rating on continued growth could quickly push the price target higher, flipping the asymmetry ratio positive without requiring a price pullback. | ||
Despite a 50.5x forward P/E, the PEG ratio of 0.22 suggests the market is not fully pricing in the company's growth rate. Valuation breakdown | PEG ratio stays below 1.0 as growth continues to outpace the stock's price appreciation. | →Stable |
| CounterA 50.5x forward P/E is priced for continued strong execution; any deceleration from the current 44% growth pace could compress the multiple sharply. | ||
CounterFast-growing packaged-food brands often reach profitability quickly once distribution scales, so cash burn could narrow faster than the low quality score implies.
CounterRapid growth at a recently-scaled food brand can decelerate quickly once promotional or distribution-expansion effects fade, especially given the company is not yet profitable.
CounterHigh short interest can also reflect informed bearish positioning ahead of a real fundamental deterioration rather than pure noise.
CounterA re-rating on continued growth could quickly push the price target higher, flipping the asymmetry ratio positive without requiring a price pullback.
CounterA 50.5x forward P/E is priced for continued strong execution; any deceleration from the current 44% growth pace could compress the multiple sharply.
Once Upon a Farm is growing revenue rapidly (44% YoY) and trades at a statistically cheap PEG ratio, but persistent cash burn keeps its quality score below the engine's minimum floor, and elevated short interest combined with a negative risk/reward setup have triggered an exit signal.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 8.1 |
| Fwd P/E | 2.4 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 4.6 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.0 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 6.5 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 0.6 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.5 |
| Volume | 3.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.3 |
| quality rank | 0.6 |
| growth rank | 9.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.8 |
| support resistance | 6.3 |
| 52w position | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 1.3 |
| days to cover | 0.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| debt equity | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCKSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.8B) below institutional reach
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.8B<$5B
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Growth at 10.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:2.9<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Insider at 7.5, and Catalyst at 7.5; the weakest are Risk (lower is worse) at 2.0, Momentum at 2.9, and Quality at 3.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.18 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 15% YoY from the current 44% pace.
Trip ifFree cash flow margin stays below -5% of revenue for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 30% of float from the current 22%.
Trip ifDownside risk exceeds 20% while upside to price target stays below 5%.
Trip ifPEG ratio rises above 1.5 from the current 0.22.