Value
0.0/10data confidence 20%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
- ▸Expensive valuation
NWCL · Why this verdict
Why newcleo (NWCL) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score4.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
newcleo is a cash-burning, high-leverage industrial name in a confirmed downtrend with a death cross, and its low quality score and declining revenue make it a value-trap risk.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality scores 1.7, below the 4.0 floor, driven by cash burn of -313% of revenue, no competitive moat and a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9. Quality breakdown | Quality score should rise above 4.0 as free cash flow burn narrows over 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterAn early-stage nuclear technology company can legitimately burn cash while building capacity, so weak current quality may precede later scale benefits. | ||
Revenue is declining 15.2% YoY and debt-to-equity is 4.1, triggering two of five value-trap signals. Bear case | Revenue growth should turn above 0% YoY and debt-to-equity should fall below 3 within 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterLumpy contract revenue can make a single-year decline misleading, and leverage may be funding capacity that comes online later. | ||
Momentum scores 2.4, below the 4.5 threshold, with price below the 200-day moving average and a slope of -1.8% over 30 days confirming a downtrend. Momentum breakdown | Price should reclaim the 200-day moving average and momentum should exceed 4.5. | Tripped↑Improving |
| CounterHeavily sold stocks can reverse sharply, and the negative momentum may already be priced in. | ||
A death cross hard block is active, which stops the engine from allowing any entry regardless of other scores. Engine gate (failed) | The death cross should clear, with the short-term average moving back above the long-term average. | →Stable |
| CounterMoving-average crossovers lag price and often signal after most of the decline has occurred. | ||
The engine finds no clear edge and exhausted upside, so the recommendation is AVOID with zero position size. Edge rationale | A defined edge and positive asymmetry should emerge before any position is sized. | →Stable |
| CounterResistance-based take-profit at $10.44 implies 39.8% upside from $7.47, so a reversal could be rewarding. | ||
Quality scores 1.7, below the 4.0 floor, driven by cash burn of -313% of revenue, no competitive moat and a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Quality score should rise above 4.0 as free cash flow burn narrows over 12 months.
CounterAn early-stage nuclear technology company can legitimately burn cash while building capacity, so weak current quality may precede later scale benefits.
Revenue is declining 15.2% YoY and debt-to-equity is 4.1, triggering two of five value-trap signals.
↓DeterioratingBear case
- Expectation
- Revenue growth should turn above 0% YoY and debt-to-equity should fall below 3 within 12 months.
CounterLumpy contract revenue can make a single-year decline misleading, and leverage may be funding capacity that comes online later.
Momentum scores 2.4, below the 4.5 threshold, with price below the 200-day moving average and a slope of -1.8% over 30 days confirming a downtrend.
Tripped↑ImprovingMomentum breakdown
- Expectation
- Price should reclaim the 200-day moving average and momentum should exceed 4.5.
CounterHeavily sold stocks can reverse sharply, and the negative momentum may already be priced in.
A death cross hard block is active, which stops the engine from allowing any entry regardless of other scores.
→StableEngine gate (failed)
- Expectation
- The death cross should clear, with the short-term average moving back above the long-term average.
CounterMoving-average crossovers lag price and often signal after most of the decline has occurred.
The engine finds no clear edge and exhausted upside, so the recommendation is AVOID with zero position size.
→StableEdge rationale
- Expectation
- A defined edge and positive asymmetry should emerge before any position is sized.
CounterResistance-based take-profit at $10.44 implies 39.8% upside from $7.47, so a reversal could be rewarding.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
4.2/10data confidence 71%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 1.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 7.8 |
| Moat | 6.5 |
| Piotroski F | 5.6 |
Growth
10.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong growth: 46% YoY
Momentum
2.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.0 |
| MACD | 3.6 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 3.0 |
- ▸Capitulation risk (RSI 19, below 200MA)
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Below 200-MA, MA slope -5.3%/30d — confirmed downtrend
Sentiment
5.4/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 5.8 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 25%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.5/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.0 |
| quality rank | 5.0 |
| growth rank | 9.1 |
- ▸Industry growth leader
Technical
5.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 7.2 |
| support resistance | 8.6 |
| 52w position | 0.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.3/10data confidence 60%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| days to cover | 6.4 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| debt equity | 9.5 |
Catalyst
6.0/10data confidence 25%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| news activity | 6.0 |
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position. | News modifier +1 (SELL_IF_HOLDING → HOLD_IF_HOLDING).
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_SELL|L3:NEWS_MOD=+1Passed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:NO_DATE
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:2.3<4.5
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
Warning (1)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupFalling Knife — Death cross, below all MAs, RSI 19, MACD bearish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilitySpeculative — Drawdown -60% (>40% off 52w high)
Investment implication
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 10.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:2.3<4.5, DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.00 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Catalyst at 6.0, and Peer rank at 5.5; the weakest are Value at 0.0, Momentum at 2.3, and Quality at 4.2. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Quality Below Floor
Trip ifFree cash flow burn exceeds 200% of revenue for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Declining Revenue High Leverage
Trip ifRevenue growth stays below 0% YoY and debt-to-equity exceeds 4 for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Confirmed DowntrendTripped
Trip ifPrice falls below the $6.95 stop level with momentum below 2.4.
- P4Death Cross Hard Block
Trip ifDeath cross stays active for more than 90 days.
- P5Limited Upside No Edge
Trip ifPrice rises above $10.44 with quality still below 4.0.