Skip to main content
NTAPNetApp, Inc.Sell6.2·$223.66
NTAP · Why this verdict

Why NetApp (NTAP) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.2/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

NetApp is a high-quality compounder with 30% revenue growth, a 115% return on equity and four straight earnings beats, but the stock trades 11.6% above the analyst target and insiders are selling.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Revenue grew about 30% year over year, with $2.025B in the July 2026 quarter against $1.559B a year earlier.

→Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Revenue should keep growing at 15% or better toward the $2.10B next-quarter estimate.

CounterA 30% rate is well above the historical 5% to 8% pace seen through 2024 and 2025, so growth could slow back sharply.

Return on equity is excellent at 115%, margins are strong at 19%, the economic moat is wide and the Rule of 40 score is 46.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Return on equity should stay above 80% and margins near 19% over the next 12 months.

CounterThe high return on equity partly reflects leverage (debt to equity of 1.7), which also triggered a 1.0 leverage penalty in the score.

The company beat EPS estimates in all 4 of the last quarters with an average surprise of about 10.1%, including a 21.5% beat to $2.58 in the latest report.

↑Improving
Earnings track record
Expectation
EPS should keep meeting or beating estimates at the 1 December 2026 report.

CounterThe latest beat was much larger than the prior three (2.8% to 8.8%), so the next report faces a tougher comparison.

Price of $215.48 is 11.6% above the $190.52 analyst target, with about 7% downside to the $200.40 stop.

↓Deteriorating
Upside pct
Expectation
Analyst targets should rise toward the current price if growth persists.

CounterA negative reward-to-risk of -1.4 and a put/call ratio of 2.20 mean there is no valuation cushion against a slowdown.

Insiders made 24 sales worth $36.2M in 90 days with no buys, which is only 0.086% of market cap and not a signal of trouble.

→Stable
Insider selling
Expectation
Insider selling should stay below 0.2% of market cap over the next 12 months.

CounterThe signal is bearish with zero insider buys, and selling at 24 transactions in a quarter suggests insiders see the stock as fully valued.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

4.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E4.1
P/S6.2
EV/EBITDA0.0
Fwd P/E6.4
PEG4.0
Analyst target3.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 20.0x
  • ▸PEG: 2.52

Quality

8.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE10.0
ROA7.8
Gross margin10.0
Op margin10.0
Net margin9.6
Current ratio4.7
FCF quality6.1
Moat7.5
Rule of 407.7
Piotroski F7.8
  • ▸Excellent ROE: 115%
  • ▸Strong margins: 19%
  • ▸Wide economic moat
  • ▸Compounder quality: strong returns + growth

Growth

10.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth10.0
EPS growth10.0
  • ▸Strong growth: 30% YoY

Momentum

5.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD0.0
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume0.5
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating7.3
Price target4.2
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

3.7/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality4.5
insider conviction2.0
holder change4.7
  • ▸Modest insider selling — $36,238,617 (0.082% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

5.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank4.3
quality rank8.5
growth rank8.0
  • ▸Superior ROE vs peers
  • ▸Industry growth leader

Technical

5.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger4.7
support resistance4.5
52w position8.6

Risk (lower is worse)

4.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.5
days to cover7.1
volatility2.2
put call0.0
implied vol4.1
max pain risk3.0
beta5.2
debt equity3.6
  • ▸Elevated put/call: 2.33
  • ▸Above max pain $110

Catalyst

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg7.5
dividend safety6.8
  • ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (7)
  • MOMENTUM:5.0>=4.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:33d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.6=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
  • MOMENTUM:5.0<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
-1.57
Upside
-14.8%
Downside
9.4%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRange Bound — RSI 46 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.45>1.3

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 10.0) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.6=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -1.57 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Quality at 8.1, and Catalyst at 6.9; the weakest are Insider at 3.7, Risk (lower is worse) at 4.1, and Value at 4.1. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.57 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Perfect Earnings Beat Streak

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2High Quality Compounder

    Trip ifOperating and net margins average less than 14% from the current 19%.

  • P3Strong Revenue Growth

    Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 15% YoY from the current 30%.

  • P4Price Above Analyst Target

    Trip ifPrice falls below the $200.40 stop, a drop of more than 7% from $215.48.

  • P5Insider Selling Small Vs Market Cap

    Trip if90-day insider selling exceeds 0.2% of market cap from the current 0.086%.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › NTAP › Why this verdict