Value
5.3/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 6.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 1.0 |
| PEG | 5.4 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 142.0x
- ▸PEG: 1.40
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Nano Dimension is in a confirmed downtrend with weak quality (2.8, below the 4.0 floor), cash burn and a poor earnings-surprise record, with a very high forward P/E of 141x and no analyst target offering a valuation anchor.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality is 2.8, below the 4.0 floor, with ROE, ROA and operating margin components at 0.0, free cash flow at negative 1% of revenue and a gross margin component of only 3.8. Quality breakdown | Operating margin turns positive and quality rises above 4.0 within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA moat component of 6.5, a Piotroski component of 6.7 and a current ratio of 5 suggest the balance sheet is sound and cash burn is small at -1% of revenue. | ||
Momentum is 2.5, below the 4.5 gate, with price below all moving averages, a 200-day slope of -1.5% over 30 days, falling on-balance volume and a death cross that hard-blocks entry. Momentum breakdown | Price reclaims the 200-day average and momentum rises above 4.5 over the next 12 months. | ↑Improving |
| CounterA shallow -1.5% 200-day slope and RSI at 31 suggest the downtrend is mild and near oversold, so a reversal is plausible. | ||
Earnings history shows 1 beat and 3 misses in the last 4 reported quarters with an average surprise of -160%, and earnings are flagged as a concern. Avg surprise pct | EPS meets or beats consensus at the report due in 18 days and the beat count improves. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe 4-quarter history listed dates from 2020 to 2022, so the surprise average is stale and may not reflect current earnings reliability. | ||
Forward P/E is 141.0x with a PEG of 1.39, so the stock is not cheap on forward earnings despite a trading price of $1.41. Valuation breakdown | Forward earnings rise enough to bring forward P/E below 50x within 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterEV/EBITDA and price-to-sales components score 10.0 and 7.0, so the stock looks inexpensive on enterprise value and sales, and the forward P/E is based on small earnings. | ||
Take-profit is the resistance level of $1.61, 14.2% above the $1.41 price against 4.3% downside to the $1.35 stop, with no analyst target and upside flagged as exhausted. Take profit | Price breaks above the $1.61 resistance level while holding above the $1.35 support. | →Stable |
| CounterResistance-based targets are technical, not fundamental, and Bollinger and support components of 10.0 and 9.2 suggest the price sits at support. | ||
CounterA moat component of 6.5, a Piotroski component of 6.7 and a current ratio of 5 suggest the balance sheet is sound and cash burn is small at -1% of revenue.
CounterA shallow -1.5% 200-day slope and RSI at 31 suggest the downtrend is mild and near oversold, so a reversal is plausible.
CounterThe 4-quarter history listed dates from 2020 to 2022, so the surprise average is stale and may not reflect current earnings reliability.
CounterEV/EBITDA and price-to-sales components score 10.0 and 7.0, so the stock looks inexpensive on enterprise value and sales, and the forward P/E is based on small earnings.
CounterResistance-based targets are technical, not fundamental, and Bollinger and support components of 10.0 and 9.2 suggest the price sits at support.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 6.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 1.0 |
| PEG | 5.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 3.8 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 6.5 |
| Piotroski F | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.5 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 3.5 |
| MACD | 3.9 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 1.0 |
| Volume | 0.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.5 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.5 |
| quality rank | 0.9 |
| growth rank | 3.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 6.6 |
| support resistance | 6.9 |
| 52w position | 2.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.8 |
| days to cover | 4.2 |
| volatility | 3.0 |
| put call | 6.7 |
| implied vol | 0.9 |
| max pain risk | 7.0 |
| beta | 7.0 |
| debt equity | 9.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 0.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| news activity | 5.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORSetupFalling Knife — Death cross, below all MAs, RSI 32, MACD bearish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.6B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 2.0<4.5 outcome against Growth at 7.8 and asymmetric R:R of 0.00.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 7.8, Insider at 7.3, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.9; the weakest are Momentum at 2.0, Quality at 2.8, and Catalyst at 3.0. The V9 engine flagged 4 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifFree cash flow falls below -10% of revenue for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifPrice falls below the $1.35 stop level, more than 4% under $1.41.
Trip ifEPS surprise stays below -25% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifForward P/E stays above 100x for 4 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifPrice stays below the $1.61 resistance level for 12 months.