Value
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.7 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.2 |
| PEG | 3.1 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 14.4x
- ▸PEG: 3.99
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company ranks best-in-class on margins versus peers, with a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9. Peer-rank breakdown | Margin ranking should remain top-tier versus peers over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterAn earnings-quality flag on FCF-to-net-income (33%) suggests reported margins may not be fully converting into free cash flow. | ||
Natural Grocers has beaten earnings estimates in all of its last 4 reported quarters, with an average surprise of 54.8%. Catalyst breakdown | The perfect beat streak should continue over the next 4 reported quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterOne of those beats included an unusually large 185.7% surprise that skews the average; excluding that outlier, the beat magnitude may be more modest going forward. | ||
The bear case flags weak growth alongside a high PEG ratio of 3.92, suggesting the stock's forward P/E of 14.1x is expensive relative to its growth rate. Bear case | Revenue growth should reaccelerate, bringing the PEG ratio down below 2.0, over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA grocery retailer's growth is inherently modest and steady; judging it against a growth-stock PEG framework may understate its defensive value. | ||
A debt-to-equity ratio of 1.4 triggers a leverage penalty of -0.5 points, and insiders have been net sellers of $87,120, though at low materiality. Insider | Leverage should improve and insider transactions should turn neutral-to-buying over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe insider sale is explicitly flagged as low materiality, and 1.4x leverage is not unusual for a grocery retailer with real estate and inventory financing needs. | ||
CounterAn earnings-quality flag on FCF-to-net-income (33%) suggests reported margins may not be fully converting into free cash flow.
CounterOne of those beats included an unusually large 185.7% surprise that skews the average; excluding that outlier, the beat magnitude may be more modest going forward.
CounterA grocery retailer's growth is inherently modest and steady; judging it against a growth-stock PEG framework may understate its defensive value.
CounterThe insider sale is explicitly flagged as low materiality, and 1.4x leverage is not unusual for a grocery retailer with real estate and inventory financing needs.
Natural Grocers combines a perfect earnings beat streak and best-in-class margins with weak growth at an elevated PEG multiple, a leverage penalty, and low-materiality insider selling — a mixed picture supporting a more cautious position size.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.7 |
| P/S | 10.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.3 |
| Fwd P/E | 8.2 |
| PEG | 3.1 |
| Analyst target | 7.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 7.6 |
| ROA | 3.9 |
| Gross margin | 2.7 |
| Op margin | 2.1 |
| Net margin | 1.8 |
| Current ratio | 4.2 |
| FCF quality | 2.7 |
| Moat | 4.9 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.6 |
| EPS growth | 2.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 9.4 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 8.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 9.1 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.2 |
| quality rank | 8.1 |
| growth rank | 0.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.7 |
| support resistance | 2.1 |
| 52w position | 4.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.7 |
| days to cover | 5.8 |
| volatility | 3.2 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 2.3 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 5.9 |
| debt equity | 4.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.5 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 66, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.8B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.7 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Insider at 7.5) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 1.43 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Insider at 7.5, Catalyst at 7.1, and Value at 6.8; the weakest are Technical at 2.5, Growth at 2.7, and Risk (lower is worse) at 3.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.43 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEarnings beat rate falls below 75% over the next 4 reported quarters, breaking the current perfect streak.
Trip ifPEG ratio falls below 2.0 from the current 3.92, confirming reaccelerating growth.
Trip ifQuality peer-rank margin score falls below 5.0 out of 10, losing the current best-in-class ranking.
Trip ifInsider selling exceeds $500,000 over the next 90 days, well above the current low-materiality $87,120 sale.