Skip to main content
MGMistras Group IncSell5.6·$20.47
MG · Why this verdict

Why Mistras Group (MG) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.6/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroRISK_OFF

Thesis pillars

The company beat estimates in three of the last four reported quarters, with the latest EPS of 0.28 against a 0.25 estimate and an average surprise of about 25.7%.

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
EPS should meet or beat estimates at the November 4 report.

CounterThe company missed in three of the four quarters before this streak, so the beat record is recent and may not be durable.

Valuation is reasonable: the forward P/E is 17.0x and the PEG ratio is 0.96.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The forward multiple should stay below 20x while earnings grow.

CounterA forward P/E of 17.0x for a business with no moat and revenue growth scoring only 3.6 is not clearly cheap.

The stock at $21.53 is 9.2% above the $19.55 analyst target and only 1.8% from its 52-week high, with 5.4% downside to the stop.

→Stable
Upside pct
Expectation
Analyst targets need to rise above the current price for new upside to open up; otherwise the stock should consolidate.

CounterEarnings beats can prompt rapid target upgrades, and rising volume with the price above its 200-day average supports the move.

Quality is below average at 4.6 out of 10 with no competitive moat, although the Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 shows improving fundamentals.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Margins and returns should improve if the earnings beats continue.

CounterGross margin, operating margin and net margin scores are all weak at 1.8 to 3.1, limiting how much profit can improve.

Revenue is concentrated geographically, with the North America segment at 81.0% of the total, which ties results to one regional economy.

↓Deteriorating
Bear case
Expectation
The North America share should stay near 80% unless international growth accelerates.

CounterA home-market concentration in a large, stable economy can be a strength compared with diversifying into riskier regions.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.1/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E5.1
P/S9.7
EV/EBITDA5.8
Fwd P/E7.6
PEG7.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 16.2x
  • ▸PEG: 1.01
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

4.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE3.9
ROA4.2
Gross margin2.3
Op margin3.1
Net margin1.8
Current ratio6.1
FCF quality7.6
Moat3.8
Piotroski F8.9
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

6.8/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth3.6
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

3.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD1.4
OBV1.0
MA position6.0
Volume2.2
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment5.5
Analyst rating5.0
Price target6.8

Insider

6.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change6.8
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

2.6/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank4.6
quality rank1.8
growth rank0.9

Technical

8.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger8.1
support resistance8.0
52w position8.7

Risk (lower is worse)

5.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.0
days to cover9.5
volatility6.7
put call1.2
implied vol0.6
beta7.6
debt equity5.0
  • ▸Elevated put/call: 1.83
  • ▸High IV: 77%
  • ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 3 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
news activity5.0
  • ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M
  • ▸Earnings in 6 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (4)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
  • MOMENTUM:3.2<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.9=NEGATIVE
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:6d<=7d
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.90
Upside
-4.5%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.7B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.7B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Technical at 8.3) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:3.2<4.5, ASYMMETRY:-0.9=NEGATIVE, EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:6d<=7d) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.90 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Technical at 8.3, Value at 7.1, and Catalyst at 7.0; the weakest are Peer rank at 2.6, Momentum at 3.2, and Quality at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.90 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Earnings Beat Streak

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Attractive Valuation

    Trip ifForward P/E exceeds 24x from the current 17.0x.

  • P3Price Above Analyst Target

    Trip ifUpside to the analyst target rises above 10% from the current -9.2%.

  • P4No Moat Modest Quality

    Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 5/9 from the current 8/9.

  • P5North America Concentration

    Trip ifNorth America share of revenue falls below 65% from the current 81%.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › MG › Why this verdict