Skip to main content
KODKEastman Kodak CompanySell6.3·$9.42
KODK · Why this verdict

Why Eastman Kodak (KODK) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.3/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Eastman Kodak screens as cheap (forward P/E 12.0x, PEG 0.33) with strong earnings growth and a Piotroski score of 8/9, but concentration in prepress products and single-source suppliers plus only 9% upside to the analyst target leave a thin margin of safety.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Quality scores 4.0/10 with a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and current ratio component of 9.7, but gross margin is weak at 0.8/10 and ROE and net margin are at zero.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Net margin should turn positive and ROE should rise above 5% within 12 months.

CounterZero ROE and net margin show that financial strength has not translated into profits, and quality ranks in the bottom of peers (0.67 rank).

Forward P/E is 12.0x with a PEG of 0.33, and the earnings growth score is 10/10, so growth looks inexpensively priced.

↓Deteriorating
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Earnings growth should persist and the forward P/E should hold below 15x over the next 12 months.

CounterA PEG of 0.33 is built on a small earnings base after a rebound, and growth may fade quickly as comparisons toughen.

Prepress Solutions makes up 52.0% of the business, so a single product line drives results.

↑Improving
Bear case
Expectation
Prepress share of revenue should fall below 50% as other lines grow over 12 months.

CounterPrepress is a declining print-industry niche, so heavy dependence leaves limited diversification if volumes keep shrinking.

The company relies on single or limited-source suppliers, flagged as 2 high and 1 medium concentration risks in the 10-K risk factors.

↑Improving
Risk breakdown
Expectation
Supply should remain uninterrupted and gross margin should stay positive over the next 12 months.

CounterA supplier disruption could halt production, and gross margin score of only 0.8/10 leaves little cushion to absorb higher input costs.

The $10.20 analyst target is 9.0% above the $9.36 price against 8.8% downside to the $8.70 stop, a reward-to-risk of about 1.0.

↓Deteriorating
Analyst target
Expectation
Price should advance toward $10.20 as earnings growth continues over the next 12 months.

CounterAnalyst coverage is thin (1.0), so the target may be unreliable; the 28% analyst upside note suggests a higher figure could be justified.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.4/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
P/S9.8
EV/EBITDA8.9
Fwd P/E9.0
PEG10.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 12.1x
  • ▸PEG: 0.33
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

4.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA3.6
Gross margin0.8
Op margin3.2
Net margin0.0
Current ratio9.7
Moat5.8
Piotroski F8.9
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

7.1/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth7.1

Momentum

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD6.6
OBV1.0
MA position9.0
Volume3.9
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment6.0
Analyst rating5.9
Price target8.4
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (1.0) — signal dampened
  • ▸Analyst upside: 27%

Insider

6.6/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change7.7
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
  • ▸Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

5.7/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank7.3
quality rank0.8
growth rank7.7

Technical

4.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger4.6
support resistance4.7
52w position2.7

Risk (lower is worse)

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest5.0
days to cover2.4
volatility4.3
put call10.0
implied vol0.0
beta4.8
debt equity9.2
  • ▸High IV: 84%
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH, 1 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

7.0/10data confidence 25%
ComponentSub-score
news activity7.0

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:5.2>=4.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:NO_DATE
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:0.9<1.5@spot
Warning (1)
  • MOMENTUM:5.2<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
0.89
Upside
+8.3%
Downside
9.3%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 46, MACD bullish

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.9B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.57>1.3, MCap $0.9B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 5.1 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 9.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:0.9<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.89 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.4, Growth at 7.1, and Catalyst at 7.0; the weakest are Technical at 4.0, Quality at 4.0, and Risk (lower is worse) at 5.1. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.89 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Cheap Valuation Strong Growth

    Trip ifForward P/E rises above 20x from the current 12.0x.

  • P2Prepress Product Concentration

    Trip ifPrepress Solutions share of revenue exceeds 60% from the current 52%.

  • P3Single Source Supplier Risk

    Trip ifGross margin falls below 10% due to supplier cost increases.

  • P4Limited Reward To Risk

    Trip ifShare price falls below the $8.70 stop-loss level.

  • P5Improving Balance Sheet Weak Margins

    Trip ifPiotroski F-Score drops to 5 or less from the current 8.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › KODK › Why this verdict