Value
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 6.3 |
| P/S | 7.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 5.9 |
| PEG | 3.7 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 21.7x
- ▸PEG: 2.92
KMI · Why this verdict
Why Kinder Morgan (KMI) is rated HOLD
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictHOLD
Overall score5.4/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Kinder Morgan offers durable margins and two recent meaningful earnings beats in a stable midstream infrastructure business, but minimal remaining upside at current prices, a free cash flow shortfall relative to reported earnings, and a dividend safety concern limit the case for adding exposure.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Operating margins near 19% reflect the company's fee-based midstream infrastructure model, which tends to generate consistent earnings across commodity price cycles, providing a stable earnings base for dividend support. Quality breakdown | Operating margin remains above 17% for each of the next four reported quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterThe gap between reported earnings and free cash flow — with FCF covering only about half of net income — suggests that high margins do not fully translate into distributable cash, which is the metric that ultimately supports both the dividend and equity value. | ||
Despite an elevated yield, the payout carries a safety concern — free cash flow runs at roughly half of net income, meaning distributions may depend on capital market access or balance sheet capacity rather than operating cash generation alone. Catalyst breakdown | Free cash flow as a percentage of net income rises above 90% within four quarters, demonstrating that the payout is organically covered. | ↑Improving |
| CounterIf the free cash flow shortfall reflects timing of maintenance capital rather than a structural earnings-quality problem, cash generation may normalize without a payout reduction, and the yield could prove sustainable over the longer run. | ||
After an in-line quarter and a miss at the older end of the lookback, the company has posted two consecutive beats — the most recent exceeding estimates by roughly 22% — suggesting management has re-established disciplined guidance practices and improving operational execution. Earnings | Earnings beats continue in at least two of the next three reported quarters, sustaining the positive trend. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe prior miss demonstrates that execution is not assured; if volumes soften or cost pressures reappear, the improved guidance track record could be interrupted, returning sentiment to its prior cautious baseline. | ||
Short interest is minimal and the put/call ratio sits well below 0.5, indicating that options markets and short sellers see limited near-term risk in the name — a backdrop that tends to limit sharp downside moves. Risk | Put/call ratio remains below 0.5 over the next six months, confirming the benign sentiment backdrop. | ↑Improving |
| CounterFalling volume distribution — a declining on-balance volume trend — suggests institutional selling pressure is quietly building despite the benign surface-level risk metrics; if sellers intensify, the low put/call reading offers little structural protection. | ||
Operating margins near 19% reflect the company's fee-based midstream infrastructure model, which tends to generate consistent earnings across commodity price cycles, providing a stable earnings base for dividend support.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Operating margin remains above 17% for each of the next four reported quarters.
CounterThe gap between reported earnings and free cash flow — with FCF covering only about half of net income — suggests that high margins do not fully translate into distributable cash, which is the metric that ultimately supports both the dividend and equity value.
Despite an elevated yield, the payout carries a safety concern — free cash flow runs at roughly half of net income, meaning distributions may depend on capital market access or balance sheet capacity rather than operating cash generation alone.
↑ImprovingCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow as a percentage of net income rises above 90% within four quarters, demonstrating that the payout is organically covered.
CounterIf the free cash flow shortfall reflects timing of maintenance capital rather than a structural earnings-quality problem, cash generation may normalize without a payout reduction, and the yield could prove sustainable over the longer run.
After an in-line quarter and a miss at the older end of the lookback, the company has posted two consecutive beats — the most recent exceeding estimates by roughly 22% — suggesting management has re-established disciplined guidance practices and improving operational execution.
↑ImprovingEarnings
- Expectation
- Earnings beats continue in at least two of the next three reported quarters, sustaining the positive trend.
CounterThe prior miss demonstrates that execution is not assured; if volumes soften or cost pressures reappear, the improved guidance track record could be interrupted, returning sentiment to its prior cautious baseline.
Short interest is minimal and the put/call ratio sits well below 0.5, indicating that options markets and short sellers see limited near-term risk in the name — a backdrop that tends to limit sharp downside moves.
↑ImprovingRisk
- Expectation
- Put/call ratio remains below 0.5 over the next six months, confirming the benign sentiment backdrop.
CounterFalling volume distribution — a declining on-balance volume trend — suggests institutional selling pressure is quietly building despite the benign surface-level risk metrics; if sellers intensify, the low put/call reading offers little structural protection.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 3.8 |
| ROA | 3.0 |
| Gross margin | 5.7 |
| Op margin | 9.6 |
| Net margin | 9.8 |
| Current ratio | 2.7 |
| FCF quality | 2.4 |
| Moat | 5.0 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Strong margins: 20%
- ▸Earnings quality RED FLAG: 30% FCF/NI
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
5.5/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 4.8 |
| EPS growth | 6.3 |
Momentum
4.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 7.3 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 1.9 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
7.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.9 |
| Analyst rating | 7.5 |
| Price target | 6.7 |
- ▸LLM news sentiment: +0.38 (n=3)
Insider
5.2/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.3 |
- ▸Negligible insider selling — $150,510 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
3.5/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 3.6 |
| quality rank | 3.2 |
| growth rank | 1.7 |
Technical
5.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.6 |
| support resistance | 2.2 |
| 52w position | 9.3 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 8.9 |
| days to cover | 7.3 |
| volatility | 6.1 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 6.3 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 9.5 |
| debt equity | 5.0 |
| news risk | 5.5 |
- ▸Above max pain $20
Catalyst
6.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 9.2 |
| dividend safety | 3.0 |
| news activity | 7.0 |
- ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
- ▸Yield trap warning: high yield but unsafe
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Maintain position. Not compelling to add more.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_F_HOLDPassed (6)
- MOMENTUM:4.8>=4.5
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_BOOST:ANALYST:0.50
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:90d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- ASYMMETRY:0.0<1.5@spot
Warning (2)
- MOMENTUM:4.8<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
0.03
Upside
+0.3%
Downside
12.3%
Sizing output
AVOID
SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 60, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:4.8>=4.5. Top dim: Sentiment at 7.1; weakest: Peer rank at 3.5. No conviction either direction.
The strongest dimensions are Sentiment at 7.1, Risk (lower is worse) at 6.8, and Catalyst at 6.5; the weakest are Peer rank at 3.5, Momentum at 4.8, and Technical at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.03 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Durable Operating Margin Profile
Trip ifOperating margin falls below 15% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P2Improving Earnings Execution
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Dividend Yield Safety Concern
Trip ifFree cash flow as a percentage of net income rises above 90% for 2 consecutive quarters, demonstrating full organic payout coverage.
- P4Low Risk Favorable Sentiment Backdrop
Trip ifPut/call ratio rises above 1.0 for 2 consecutive weeks, signaling a meaningful shift in options market sentiment.