Value
7.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.1 |
| P/S | 9.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 11.7x
- ▸PEG: 0.21
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
An attractively valued stock with a PEG ratio of 0.24 and a perfect Piotroski F-Score, supported by three beats in the last four quarters, is undermined by a near-zero risk/reward ratio with only 0.9% upside to the price target — the valuation case is real but the current entry geometry makes action premature.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
A forward price-to-earnings ratio of approximately 10.8x and a PEG ratio of 0.24 indicate the stock screens as attractively valued relative to its growth rate, a setup that rarely persists if earnings growth continues. Valuation breakdown | The forward P/E remains below 15x and the PEG ratio stays below 0.5 over the next 12 months as earnings estimates are revised upward. | ↑Improving |
| CounterCheap multiples in this sector can persist for extended periods — particularly where governance or geopolitical concerns apply — meaning the valuation discount may reflect a structural risk premium rather than a temporary mispricing. | ||
A perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9 out of 9 signals that across all nine dimensions of balance sheet strength, profitability improvement, and operating efficiency, the business is exhibiting the full set of characteristics associated with improving financial health. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski score remains at 7 or above for the next two annual reporting periods. | →Stable |
| CounterGross margins are weak — scoring only 3.1 out of 10 on that dimension — meaning the high composite score is driven by balance sheet ratios rather than operating efficiency; a deterioration in revenue could expose the thin margin structure quickly. | ||
Three of the last four quarters produced positive earnings surprises, with an average beat of nearly 27% across all four periods, suggesting the company has been consistently ahead of analyst expectations. Earnings | Earnings beats continue in at least 3 of the next 4 reported quarters, with the average surprise remaining above 10%. | →Stable |
| CounterThe most recent quarter's miss — at negative 2.6% — came after two very large beats; if the miss pattern continues and analyst estimates catch up to actual performance, the positive surprise engine could stall. | ||
With only 0.9% upside to the price target and a risk/reward ratio well below the standard 1.5-to-1 bar, the current entry price offers insufficient compensation for the downside risk of approximately 15%. Warnings | For this pillar to be falsified, analyst price targets must be raised such that upside exceeds 15% from current levels, restoring a meaningful margin of safety. | Tripped↓Deteriorating |
| CounterThe stock has been in a technical breakout — above all moving averages with RSI near 68 and a bullish MACD — and momentum can carry price above current targets if sentiment improves, rendering the near-term upside constraint temporary. | ||
CounterCheap multiples in this sector can persist for extended periods — particularly where governance or geopolitical concerns apply — meaning the valuation discount may reflect a structural risk premium rather than a temporary mispricing.
CounterGross margins are weak — scoring only 3.1 out of 10 on that dimension — meaning the high composite score is driven by balance sheet ratios rather than operating efficiency; a deterioration in revenue could expose the thin margin structure quickly.
CounterThe most recent quarter's miss — at negative 2.6% — came after two very large beats; if the miss pattern continues and analyst estimates catch up to actual performance, the positive surprise engine could stall.
CounterThe stock has been in a technical breakout — above all moving averages with RSI near 68 and a bullish MACD — and momentum can carry price above current targets if sentiment improves, rendering the near-term upside constraint temporary.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 7.1 |
| P/S | 9.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.0 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.4 |
| Gross margin | 3.0 |
| Op margin | 0.9 |
| Net margin | 4.8 |
| Current ratio | 7.0 |
| Moat | 5.8 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 6.6 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 0.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 8.5 |
| Price target | 7.4 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.6 |
| quality rank | 3.4 |
| growth rank | 3.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.0 |
| support resistance | 5.6 |
| 52w position | 8.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.5 |
| days to cover | 7.1 |
| volatility | 4.8 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 5.3 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 8.7 |
| dividend safety | 5.5 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 20d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $3.7B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 2.1<4.5 outcome against Growth at 8.3 and asymmetric R:R of 0.26.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.3, Technical at 7.6, and Value at 7.4; the weakest are Momentum at 2.1, Quality at 4.0, and Insider at 5.0. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.26 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifForward P/E expands above 15x for 2 consecutive quarters, suggesting the valuation discount has closed.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 7 in any annual reporting period.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifAnalyst consensus price target rises above $79.00, restoring more than 15% upside from the current price of $68.85.