Value
5.6/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.6 |
| PEG | 4.2 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 32.0x
- ▸PEG: 2.29
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Johnson Outdoors is a small leisure-products maker with a strong recent earnings recovery and a 9/9 Piotroski score, but low-quality margins, supplier concentration, 14% short interest and just 7.7% upside to the analyst target limit the case.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Quality is below average at 4.2/10 with no competitive moat, even though the Piotroski score is a strong 9/9, and the company ranks near the bottom of peers on quality. Quality breakdown | Margins improve and quality moves above 5 as earnings recover. | →Stable |
| CounterReturn on equity and net margin score zero, so the earnings recovery has not yet shown up in returns. | ||
The company depends on a single vendor for certain parts and materials, a high-severity concentration risk that could interrupt production. Bear case | No supply disruption occurs and margins hold over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterA single-vendor dependence leaves little room to absorb a supplier failure or price increase. | ||
Johnson Outdoors beat estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, with $1.42 versus a $0.68 estimate in August 2026, after a large loss of $2.83 in December 2025. Earnings | Quarterly earnings stay positive and meet or beat estimates through the December 16 report. | →Stable |
| CounterThe December quarter has produced large losses in each of the last three years, so seasonal losses may return. | ||
At $45.00 the stock is 7.7% below the $48.45 analyst target, with 7.2% downside to the stop, a reward-to-risk of only 1.1. Targets | Analysts raise targets above $48.45 as earnings recover. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterUpside and downside are nearly equal, so the setup offers little margin for error. | ||
Price is below the 200-day average, which is still rising 0.8% per 30 days, while short interest is 14%. Momentum breakdown | Price reclaims the 200-day moving average and short interest declines from 14%. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterHigh short interest and seasonal losses give bears a case that the recovery will fade. | ||
CounterReturn on equity and net margin score zero, so the earnings recovery has not yet shown up in returns.
CounterA single-vendor dependence leaves little room to absorb a supplier failure or price increase.
CounterThe December quarter has produced large losses in each of the last three years, so seasonal losses may return.
CounterUpside and downside are nearly equal, so the setup offers little margin for error.
CounterHigh short interest and seasonal losses give bears a case that the recovery will fade.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.5 |
| Fwd P/E | 3.6 |
| PEG | 4.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 1.1 |
| Gross margin | 3.9 |
| Op margin | 3.9 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 9.6 |
| Moat | 5.4 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.8 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.5 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 7.2 |
| Volume | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.3 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| holder change | 6.3 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 7.7 |
| quality rank | 1.2 |
| growth rank | 4.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.8 |
| support resistance | 2.1 |
| 52w position | 7.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 3.2 |
| days to cover | 0.0 |
| volatility | 5.9 |
| beta | 8.2 |
| debt equity | 9.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| dividend safety | 5.8 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.5B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.4 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 6.9) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:1.0<1.5@spot) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.96 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 6.9, Sentiment at 6.1, and Insider at 5.9; the weakest are Technical at 3.7, Quality at 4.2, and Catalyst at 4.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 2 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.96 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifEPS surprise falls below -20% in the next 2 reported quarters.
Trip ifQuality score falls below 3.5 from the current 4.2.
Trip ifGross margin falls below 35% for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifStock price falls below the $42.56 stop level from the current $45.00.
Trip ifShort interest rises above 20% from the current 14%.