Skip to main content
ICFIICF International, Inc.Sell5.4·$95.84
ICFI · Why this verdict

Why ICF International (ICFI) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.4/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

A forward earnings multiple of 9.4x and a PEG ratio of 0.14 frame an inexpensive consulting business with 24% upside to analyst targets, but three consecutive quarters of earnings misses and a 10% revenue contraction suggest the valuation discount reflects genuine operational deterioration rather than temporary mispricing.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Revenue declined approximately 10% year-over-year, signaling that consulting demand conditions or the company's competitive positioning have meaningfully weakened, limiting the operating leverage available to improve margins from current low levels.

→Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Year-over-year revenue growth turns positive — above 0% — in the next reported quarter, indicating the contraction has reached a bottom.

CounterVolume accumulation visible in rising on-balance volume and an improving MACD suggest that market participants may be positioning for a business inflection ahead of what the trailing revenue data currently shows.

At a forward P/E of 9.4x and a PEG ratio of 0.14, the stock screens as attractively valued relative to its earnings growth profile, with analyst consensus projecting roughly 24% upside to the $89.46 price target and a risk/reward ratio of approximately 3.6-to-1.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The stock closes at least 15% of the gap to its $89.46 analyst target over the next 12 months as the valuation discount narrows toward peer multiples.

CounterA low multiple with a 0.14 PEG is appealing in isolation, but three consecutive earnings misses and contracting revenue suggest the earnings denominator may be declining — which would push the effective forward multiple higher and make the current price appear less inexpensive than it screens.

The three most recent quarters produced earnings misses of -3.2%, -1.5%, and -3.7% respectively, establishing a consecutive miss pattern that indicates the business is consistently delivering below analyst expectations.

↑Improving
Earnings
Expectation
The next quarterly report delivers a positive earnings surprise above 3%, breaking the miss streak and signaling an operational reset.

CounterThe magnitude of each miss is modest — less than 4% — suggesting these may reflect minor execution variability rather than structural deterioration; the single prior beat of +5.2% demonstrated the business can outperform when conditions align.

A put/call ratio of 2.50 — well above neutral — indicates that options market participants are positioned bearishly, implying significant institutional skepticism about the near-term outlook and creating a technical overhang on the stock.

→Stable
Risk breakdown
Expectation
Put/call ratio falls below 1.5 within two quarters, reflecting a reduction in hedging pressure as the fundamental picture clarifies.

CounterElevated put/call ratios in smaller-capitalization names can sometimes represent hedging by existing long holders rather than outright short bets; if the company begins to beat estimates, put holders may exit rapidly, providing a technical tailwind.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E6.5
P/S9.7
EV/EBITDA5.0
Fwd P/E8.9
PEG10.0
Analyst target4.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 12.4x
  • ▸PEG: 0.25
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

4.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE2.9
ROA2.8
Gross margin3.4
Op margin3.4
Net margin2.4
Current ratio5.2
FCF quality6.7
Moat4.6
Piotroski F7.8
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

3.8/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth2.4
EPS growth5.3
  • ▸Declining revenue: -0%

Momentum

6.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI4.0
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume1.2
  • ▸Overbought (RSI 79)
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment5.5
Analyst rating6.3
Price target6.7
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (4.0) — signal dampened

Insider

5.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality4.5
insider conviction2.0
holder change10.0
notable moves7.0
  • ▸Modest insider selling — $742,435 (0.043% of mkt cap)
  • ▸Institutions accumulating

Peer rank

4.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank7.0
quality rank0.6
growth rank2.2

Technical

3.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger1.3
support resistance0.8
52w position9.7

Risk (lower is worse)

7.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.1
days to cover7.2
volatility6.2
implied vol5.7
beta9.8
debt equity7.8
news risk6.0
  • ▸Concentration risks: 2 MED (10-K Item 1A)

Catalyst

4.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history0.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg3.1
dividend safety8.5
news activity6.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/3M
  • ▸Earnings in 6 days
  • ▸Dividend aristocrat: 0.6% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:6.8>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.3=NEGATIVE
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:6d<=7d
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.33
Upside
-4.9%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($1.7B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $1.7B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.2 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 7.4) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.3=NEGATIVE, EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:6d<=7d) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.33 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.4, Risk (lower is worse) at 7.3, and Momentum at 6.8; the weakest are Growth at 3.8, Technical at 3.9, and Peer rank at 4.3. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.33 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Compelling Low Multiple Valuation

    Trip ifForward P/E expands above 15x from the current 9.4x, reducing the stated valuation discount to peers.

  • P2Three Consecutive Earnings Misses

    Trip ifEPS surprise rises above 3% for 2 consecutive quarters, breaking the miss streak.

  • P3Revenue Contracting Ten Percent

    Trip ifYear-over-year revenue growth exceeds 5% for 2 consecutive quarters, reversing the contraction.

  • P4Elevated Put Call Bearish Positioning

    Trip ifPut/call ratio falls below 1.0 for 2 consecutive months, indicating that bearish hedging pressure has substantially resolved.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › ICFI › Why this verdict