Skip to main content
HYHyster-Yale, Inc.Sell4.7·$29.34
HY · Why this verdict

Why Hyster-Yale (HY) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Hyster-Yale trades at a low valuation with 47.0% upside to a $42.50 analyst target, but quality is 1.3/10, revenue is falling 15% and the last two of four quarters were misses with widening losses.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The $28.92 price sits 47.0% below the $42.50 analyst target against a 9.7% modeled downside, a reward-to-risk of 4.8.

→Stable
Targets
Expectation
Price should close part of the gap to the target as earnings recover over 12 months.

CounterA target 47% above the price after a 15% revenue decline may be stale, and analyst optimism has not translated into beats.

Hyster-Yale is valued at a forward P/E of 14.0x with a PEG of 0.11 and a top price-to-sales score, flagged as attractively valued.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Forward P/E should stay below 16x as earnings recover.

CounterThe cheap look rests on forecast earnings growth after a period of GAAP losses, and a 5.0% dividend yield may be at risk.

Quality scores 1.3/10, below the 4.0 minimum, with no competitive moat and a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Piotroski F-Score should rise above 5/9 and margins turn positive over 12 months.

CounterZero ROE and margin credit in a cyclical equipment maker mean quality is unlikely to improve until volumes recover.

Revenue is declining 15%, ranking Hyster-Yale at the bottom of peers on growth.

→Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Revenue should stabilize and return to positive YoY growth within 12 months.

CounterHeavy-equipment demand is cyclical, and a continued capital-spending pullback could push the decline further.

Hyster-Yale split the last 4 quarters 2 beats and 2 misses, with the latest quarter a miss at -$1.64 against -$1.13.

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
Losses should narrow, with EPS at or above consensus in the next 2 reports, starting November 2026.

CounterEPS has been -$1.64, -$1.64 and -$2.06 in recent quarters, so even beats come with large losses.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.5/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
P/S10.0
Fwd P/E8.3
PEG10.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 14.2x
  • ▸PEG: 0.11
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

1.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA0.0
Gross margin0.0
Op margin0.0
Net margin0.0
Current ratio4.8
Moat2.5
Piotroski F3.3
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Weak Piotroski F-Score: 3/9
  • ▸Quality concerns

Growth

5.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth0.0
EPS growth10.0
  • ▸Declining revenue: -15%

Momentum

2.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.5
MACD3.2
OBV1.0
MA position2.2
Volume0.7
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA but MA still rising (+0.1%/30d) — pullback in uptrend, not confirmed weakness

Sentiment

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target9.9
erm sentiment5.0
  • ▸Analyst upside: 70%

Insider

4.0/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change4.1
notable moves3.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

3.5/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank9.4
quality rank1.1
growth rank0.0

Technical

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger6.9
support resistance6.7
52w position4.4

Risk (lower is worse)

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest6.8
days to cover5.7
volatility2.1
put call10.0
implied vol2.0
beta4.6
debt equity4.6
  • ▸High IV: 68%
  • ▸Concentration risks: 4 MED (10-K Item 1A)

Catalyst

3.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
dividend safety5.8
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
  • ▸Earnings in 11 days
  • ▸Dividend: 4.9%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (6)
  • ASYMMETRY:5.4>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • MOMENTUM:2.1<4.5
Warning (1)
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:11d<=14d (soft)
Reward-to-Risk
5.38
Upside
+44.9%
Downside
8.3%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.5B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.63>1.3, MCap $0.5B<$5B

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 2.1<4.5 outcome against Value at 9.5 and asymmetric R:R of 5.38.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.5, Sentiment at 6.6, and Technical at 6.0; the weakest are Quality at 1.3, Momentum at 2.1, and Peer rank at 3.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 5.38 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Upside To Analyst Target

    Trip ifAnalyst target is cut below $32.00 from the current $42.50.

  • P2Cheap Valuation Metrics

    Trip ifForward P/E rises above 20x as earnings estimates are cut.

  • P3Weak Business Quality

    Trip ifPiotroski F-Score stays below 4/9 for 4 consecutive quarters.

  • P4Declining Revenue

    Trip ifRevenue decline exceeds 20% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P5Mixed Earnings Record Widening Losses

    Trip ifEPS misses estimates in at least 2 of the next 3 quarters.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › HY › Why this verdict