Value
5.8/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.5 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.6 |
| PEG | 5.2 |
- ▸PEG: 1.44
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company posts a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9 out of 9, indicating strong underlying financial health signals. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski F-Score should hold at or near this perfect level over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterBelow-average business quality is separately flagged as a key risk, and the peer comparison ranks quality near the bottom of the group, suggesting the strong Piotroski read does not extend across every quality dimension. | ||
The overall assessment screens as weak, and the data separately flags below-average business quality as a key risk. Bear case | The overall assessment should improve and the quality read should move above average over the next 12 months for this concern to ease. | →Stable |
| CounterThe same underlying business posts a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9 out of 9, indicating certain financial-health checks are actually quite strong even as the headline overall read is weak. | ||
The technical setup is read as a breakout, with a golden cross in place, the shares trading above all major moving averages, and MACD reading bullish. Chart pattern detection | The breakout setup should hold with price remaining above key moving averages over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterThe shares recently posted an extreme 7.1% gap up that the data itself flags may pull back, which could undercut the breakout read in the near term. | ||
The engine's asymmetry check flags the upside as exhausted, citing 0.0% remaining upside in the current setup. Gates warning | The asymmetry read should clear the exhausted flag as upside potential reopens over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterEvery listed gate — including momentum, insider activity, recent filings, and news events — passes clean, suggesting the exhausted-upside read is an isolated caution rather than a broad-based negative signal. | ||
The shares recently posted an extreme gap up of 7.1% that the data itself flags may pull back, pointing to a stretched near-term technical setup. Technical breakdown | Shares should digest the gap without a sharp retracement over the next 12 months for the pullback risk to fade. | →Stable |
| CounterVolume shows accumulation via a rising on-balance-volume reading, suggesting buying support may absorb the gap rather than trigger the flagged pullback. | ||
CounterBelow-average business quality is separately flagged as a key risk, and the peer comparison ranks quality near the bottom of the group, suggesting the strong Piotroski read does not extend across every quality dimension.
CounterThe same underlying business posts a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9 out of 9, indicating certain financial-health checks are actually quite strong even as the headline overall read is weak.
CounterThe shares recently posted an extreme 7.1% gap up that the data itself flags may pull back, which could undercut the breakout read in the near term.
CounterEvery listed gate — including momentum, insider activity, recent filings, and news events — passes clean, suggesting the exhausted-upside read is an isolated caution rather than a broad-based negative signal.
CounterVolume shows accumulation via a rising on-balance-volume reading, suggesting buying support may absorb the gap rather than trigger the flagged pullback.
Haverty Furniture's Class A shares show a weak overall assessment and below-average business quality alongside a stretched post-gap technical setup, though a perfect Piotroski F-Score and a bullish breakout pattern offer some offsetting strength.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.5 |
| P/S | 9.9 |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.6 |
| PEG | 5.2 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.2 |
| ROA | 1.5 |
| Gross margin | 8.1 |
| Op margin | 1.0 |
| Net margin | 1.3 |
| Current ratio | 6.5 |
| FCF quality | 6.1 |
| Moat | 6.0 |
| Piotroski F | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.5 |
| EPS growth | 4.6 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.0 |
| MACD | 9.5 |
| OBV | 5.9 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.0 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 2.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.8 |
| support resistance | 2.6 |
| 52w position | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 9.8 |
| days to cover | 10.0 |
| volatility | 2.5 |
| beta | 6.4 |
| debt equity | 6.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| dividend safety | 3.5 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLnone
SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 62, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.5B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.9 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Momentum at 7.3) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.00 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Momentum at 7.3, Risk (lower is worse) at 7.1, and Value at 5.8; the weakest are Technical at 2.8, Peer rank at 3.0, and Growth at 4.0. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifThe overall assessment score rises above 6.0 out of 10 from the current 4.9.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 6 out of 9 from the current 9.
Trip ifPrice falls below the 200-day moving average for more than 5 trading days.
Trip ifThe asymmetry ratio rises above 0.5 from the current 0.0.
Trip ifPrice rises more than 10% from the current $29.95 without retracing below $29.95.