Skip to main content
HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc.Sell6.2·$192.93
HURN · Why this verdict

Why Huron Consulting Group (HURN) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.2/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Huron Consulting screens as deeply undervalued on growth-adjusted metrics with a four-quarter beat streak and 46% upside to the analyst target, but a confirmed price downtrend and elevated leverage have blocked the near-term entry — the setup rewards patience while technical repair unfolds.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

A forward price-to-earnings of 10.5x alongside a PEG of 0.14 suggests the market is attaching almost no credit to the company's earnings trajectory, creating a potentially large gap between intrinsic and current value if the earnings growth profile holds.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The valuation gap begins to close as the forward multiple re-rates toward 15x over the next 12 months, supported by continued earnings beats.

CounterA very low PEG can reflect thin analyst coverage — with only 4 active analysts — and the risk that estimates are set too optimistically; if the 72% analyst upside target is revised lower as coverage broadens, the gap may be smaller than it currently appears.

Four consecutive quarterly beats averaging over 9% positive surprise — including two quarters with double-digit outperformance — indicate management has been consistently under-promising and over-delivering, a track record that supports revaluation if the pattern holds.

→Stable
Earnings
Expectation
Beat streak extends to 6 consecutive quarters, with average surprise staying above 5%.

CounterThe most recent quarter showed the smallest beat in the trailing run (just under 8%); if leverage at 2.2x debt-to-equity constrains operational flexibility during a softer revenue quarter, the cadence could break precisely when the stock most needs it.

The stock is trading below its 200-day moving average with that average declining at -2.2% over 30 days — a pattern consistent with a confirmed downtrend that historically requires a fundamental catalyst to reverse rather than simply the passage of time.

↓Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
This pillar is resolved when the stock closes above the 200-day moving average for 10 consecutive sessions and the slope of that average turns positive.

CounterInternal momentum is already improving — the MACD is rising and RSI is at 56 (neither oversold nor overextended) — suggesting price may be turning before the moving average crossover completes, potentially accelerating the recovery.

A debt-to-equity ratio of 2.2x imposes a meaningful penalty on the quality profile and narrows the cushion if revenues soften — in a consulting business where revenue is tied to client utilization, that leverage amplifies the earnings impact of any demand pullback.

↓Deteriorating
Bear case
Expectation
Leverage concern eases if the debt-to-equity ratio falls below 1.5x over the next 12 months.

CounterA Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9 indicates the balance sheet is otherwise sound on most accounting dimensions, and strong liquidity metrics suggest debt service is manageable at current levels.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E4.5
P/S9.2
EV/EBITDA2.8
Fwd P/E6.9
PEG10.0
Analyst target3.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 18.2x
  • ▸PEG: 0.24

Quality

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE9.0
ROA5.7
Gross margin2.5
Op margin4.7
Net margin3.3
Current ratio6.1
FCF quality9.4
Moat6.0
Piotroski F8.9
  • ▸Excellent ROE: 27%
  • ▸Excellent cash conversion: 131% FCF/NI
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9

Growth

8.2/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth6.4
EPS growth10.0

Momentum

5.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.9
MACD10.0
OBV1.0
MA position7.5
Volume3.4
  • ▸Overbought (RSI 82)
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat/negative + RSI 82 (late-cycle distribution risk)

Sentiment

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment7.2
Analyst rating7.1
Price target5.7
  • ▸LLM news sentiment: +0.45 (n=4)
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (4.0) — signal dampened

Insider

6.3/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change7.0
notable moves7.0
  • ▸Insider selling (low materiality) — $335,093 (0.011% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.7/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank2.8
quality rank5.6
growth rank8.9
  • ▸Industry growth leader

Technical

4.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger2.2
support resistance2.2
52w position9.0

Risk (lower is worse)

4.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest7.2
days to cover7.5
volatility3.8
put call0.0
implied vol1.4
beta10.0
debt equity2.8
  • ▸Elevated put/call: 24.04
  • ▸High IV: 72%

Catalyst

7.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg8.1
news activity8.0
  • ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • ▸Earnings in 4 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:5.2>=4.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:4d<=7d
Warning (1)
  • MOMENTUM:5.2<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
Reward-to-Risk
-0.73
Upside
-11.0%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $3.1B<$5B

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.0 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 8.2) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.7=NEGATIVE, EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:4d<=7d) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.73 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Growth at 8.2, Catalyst at 7.2, and Sentiment at 6.7; the weakest are Technical at 4.5, Risk (lower is worse) at 4.7, and Peer rank at 4.7. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.73 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Compelling Valuation Gap

    Trip ifForward P/E expands above 18x for 2 consecutive quarters, indicating the valuation gap has been substantially closed.

  • P2Consistent Earnings Outperformance

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P3Confirmed Price Downtrend

    Trip ifStock closes above the 200-day moving average for 10 consecutive trading sessions.

  • P4Elevated Leverage Penalty

    Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio falls below 1.5x.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › HURN › Why this verdict