Value
5.2/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 7.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.7 |
| p ocf | 9.2 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
- ▸P/OCF: 6.9x (FFO proxy — REITs gated off P/E)
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Gladstone Commercial is flagged as a high-quality business, passing the Rule of 40 test at 59 with a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9. Bull case | The Rule of 40 score should stay comfortably above the 40 pass threshold and the Piotroski score should hold at 7 or higher. | →Stable |
| CounterA REIT's Rule of 40 pass driven heavily by funds-from-operations-based growth metrics can mask underlying tenant credit risk or occupancy softness not directly captured in the score. | ||
The company has missed earnings estimates in 2 of its last 4 quarters, which the engine flags explicitly as a bear-case concern. Bear case | The company should return to meeting or beating estimates in the next reported quarter, breaking the miss pattern. | →Stable |
| CounterConsecutive misses in a REIT's funds-from-operations per share can stem from one-time acquisition or disposition timing rather than a structural earnings-power decline. | ||
The stock carries a leverage penalty from a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.5, scored as a -1.5 drag by the engine. Bear case | The debt-to-equity ratio should decline from 2.5 toward a more conservative level as the balance sheet delevers. | →Stable |
| CounterElevated leverage is structurally common for REITs financing real estate with debt, so a 2.5x ratio may be within normal range for the property-REIT peer group rather than an outlier risk. | ||
The engine's asymmetry gate failed at -0.98 since the stock has already reached its prior analyst target, leaving -6.5% implied upside. Engine gate (failed) | The asymmetry ratio should turn positive as either the price pulls back or the analyst target is raised. | →Stable |
| CounterA negative asymmetry ratio at a reached target can persist for an extended stretch for an income-oriented REIT that primarily trades on its dividend yield rather than price appreciation. | ||
CounterA REIT's Rule of 40 pass driven heavily by funds-from-operations-based growth metrics can mask underlying tenant credit risk or occupancy softness not directly captured in the score.
CounterConsecutive misses in a REIT's funds-from-operations per share can stem from one-time acquisition or disposition timing rather than a structural earnings-power decline.
CounterElevated leverage is structurally common for REITs financing real estate with debt, so a 2.5x ratio may be within normal range for the property-REIT peer group rather than an outlier risk.
CounterA negative asymmetry ratio at a reached target can persist for an extended stretch for an income-oriented REIT that primarily trades on its dividend yield rather than price appreciation.
Gladstone Commercial is a high-quality REIT passing the Rule of 40 with strong Piotroski fundamentals, but 2 consecutive earnings misses, elevated leverage at a 2.5 debt-to-equity ratio, and a negative asymmetry gate at a reached price target temper the bull case.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 7.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.7 |
| p ocf | 9.2 |
| Analyst target | 4.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 2.1 |
| ROA | 2.2 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 6.4 |
| Current ratio | 6.7 |
| FCF quality | 10.0 |
| Moat | 6.4 |
| Rule of 40 | 9.4 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 5.4 |
| EPS growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 7.3 |
| OBV | 5.3 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 1.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 6.6 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 4.2 |
| quality rank | 6.2 |
| growth rank | 7.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 3.6 |
| support resistance | 3.7 |
| 52w position | 8.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.7 |
| days to cover | 4.7 |
| volatility | 7.2 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 5.8 |
| beta | 6.7 |
| debt equity | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 4.2 |
Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.
L4:PATH_F_SELLSetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 56, MACD bullish
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.6B<$5B
The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 4.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Growth at 7.7) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-1.0=NEGATIVE) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.98 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 7.7, Insider at 7.3, and Quality at 7.2; the weakest are Peer rank at 4.5, Catalyst at 5.1, and Value at 5.2. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.98 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRule of 40 score falls below 40, down from the current 59, ending the pass.
Trip ifEarnings surprise rises above 0% in the next reported quarter, breaking the current pattern of 2 consecutive misses.
Trip ifDebt-to-equity ratio rises above 3.5, up from the current 2.5, deepening the leverage penalty.
Trip ifAsymmetry ratio rises above 0, turning positive from the current -0.98.