Skip to main content
GDOTGreen Dot CorporationSell5.9·$12.26
GDOT · Why this verdict

Why Green Dot (GDOT) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Green Dot trades at a forward P/E of 8.2x with roughly 19% revenue growth and 10.9% analyst upside, but quality scores only 1.5 out of 10 and the most recent quarter missed estimates.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Quality scores 1.5 out of 10, below the 4.0 floor, with return on equity and net margin near zero and no competitive moat.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Quality score rises above 4.0 as profitability recovers.

CounterPiotroski F-Score of 5.6 shows the fundamentals are not collapsing, and the low quality score may reflect depressed trailing earnings.

A forward P/E of 8.2x and PEG of 0.02 make the shares attractively valued.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Forward P/E moves toward 11x as earnings are delivered.

CounterA PEG of 0.02 comes from a near-zero base of earnings growth, and the multiple is cheap partly because profitability is thin.

Quarterly revenue of $574.4M is about 19% above the $482.7M of a year earlier.

→Stable
Revenue quarters
Expectation
Year-over-year revenue growth stays above 10%.

CounterRevenue data for this company is flagged as divergent between sources, and revenue dropped from $629.0M to $574.4M last quarter.

The latest quarter missed ($0.26 versus $0.39) after three straight beats, with earnings due in 16 days.

→Stable
Last 4 quarters
Expectation
EPS returns to beating consensus in the November report.

CounterThe three earlier quarters beat by large margins (average surprise 45%), so the miss may be noise in volatile quarterly profits.

The $13.71 analyst target is 10.9% above the $12.36 price against 5.0% downside to the stop level.

→Stable
Upside pct
Expectation
Price moves toward the $13.71 target within 12 months.

CounterImplied volatility of 111% shows large uncertainty, and the stock is below its 200-day average, so the target may not be reached.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.8/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
P/S10.0
Fwd P/E9.5
PEG10.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 8.2x
  • ▸PEG: 0.02
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

1.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA0.0
Gross margin0.0
Op margin0.3
Net margin0.0
Moat4.8
Piotroski F5.6
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Quality concerns

Growth

7.1/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth7.1

Momentum

4.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.5
MACD6.3
OBV1.0
MA position2.0
Volume8.1
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA (recent, shallow — too early to call)

Sentiment

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target8.7
erm sentiment5.0
  • ▸Analyst upside: 32%

Insider

5.8/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change5.5
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

5.5/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank9.7
quality rank0.8
growth rank6.5

Technical

6.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger6.3
support resistance6.2
52w position6.6

Risk (lower is worse)

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest8.5
days to cover6.9
volatility8.1
put call10.0
implied vol0.0
beta8.0
  • ▸High IV: 122%

Catalyst

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history6.7
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg10.0
  • ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
  • ▸Earnings in 11 days

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (6)
  • ASYMMETRY:2.4>=1.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • MOMENTUM:4.2<4.5
Warning (1)
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:11d<=14d (soft)
Reward-to-Risk
2.36
Upside
+11.8%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 11d with 3/4 beat streak

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.7B<$5B

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 4.2<4.5 outcome against Value at 9.8 and asymmetric R:R of 2.36.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.8, Growth at 7.1, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.9; the weakest are Quality at 1.5, Momentum at 4.2, and Peer rank at 5.5. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.36 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Deep Value Forward Multiple

    Trip ifForward P/E rises above 11x from the current 8.2x.

  • P2Weak Business Quality

    Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 from the current 1.5.

  • P3Revenue Growth Recovery

    Trip ifYear-over-year revenue growth falls below 8% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P4Recent Earnings Miss

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P5Analyst Upside To Target

    Trip ifAnalyst target falls below $12.36, eliminating upside from the current price.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › GDOT › Why this verdict