Skip to main content
GGenpact LimitedSell5.9·$38.84
G · Why this verdict

Why Genpact (G) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

An IT services business with a perfect four-quarter beat streak, a forward P/E of 6.9 times earnings, and a 19% margin of safety relative to analyst consensus offers compelling value and a favorable risk/reward of 2.7-to-1 — but two failed technical gates and a confirmed downtrend with falling volume mean the setup cannot be acted on until the chart structure reverses.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The stock trades at a forward P/E of 6.9 times and a PEG ratio of 0.39, with analyst consensus implying a 37% margin of safety to the price target — a valuation that screens attractively cheap relative to both the quality of the underlying business and its peers.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
Within 12 months, the stock closes within 10% of the analyst consensus target as the valuation gap narrows.

CounterCheap valuations can persist indefinitely when no clear catalyst is present; with two failed technical gates and falling on-balance volume, the discount may widen further before it compresses, and consensus EPS estimate cuts would erode the apparent cheapness without any price movement.

The business has exceeded consensus earnings estimates in each of the last four reported quarters, with an average positive surprise of 5.3%, demonstrating consistent and predictable execution that reduces near-term earnings risk.

↑Improving
Earnings
Expectation
A fifth consecutive beat in the next reported quarter, with a positive EPS surprise above 3%, would confirm that execution discipline is a durable feature rather than a run of favorable comparisons.

CounterEach beat has been incremental — ranging from roughly 3% to 8% above estimate — suggesting gradual rather than transformative outperformance, which may be insufficient to catalyze a meaningful re-rating from the current depressed multiple.

Free cash flow converts at 125% of net income and the Piotroski financial health score is a perfect 9 out of 9 — the highest possible reading — indicating that reported earnings are fully backed by genuine cash and that the balance sheet is in excellent condition.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Free-cash-flow conversion remains above 100% of net income for the next 2 annual reporting periods, sustaining the quality signal.

CounterShort interest at 12% against a business with a perfect Piotroski score and a consistent beat streak suggests short sellers may be positioned on concerns not captured in backward-looking balance-sheet metrics, such as sector-level budget pressure or AI-driven demand shifts that have yet to appear in reported results.

The stock is in a confirmed downtrend — below a 200-day moving average declining at 4.2% per month, with volume distributing rather than accumulating — conditions that blocked two technical gates and warrant waiting for chart confirmation before acting on the favorable fundamental setup.

↓Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
The technical barrier lifts when the stock reclaims and holds above its 200-day moving average for 3 consecutive weeks with on-balance volume turning positive.

CounterThe MACD is improving, RSI has stabilized near 50, and the options market shows a very low put/call ratio of 0.18 — suggesting near-term bearish conviction is fading and that a technical recovery may be closer than the death-cross signal alone implies.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

7.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E8.7
P/S9.5
EV/EBITDA6.8
Fwd P/E9.5
PEG9.5
Analyst target4.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 8.6x
  • ▸PEG: 0.59
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

6.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE7.5
ROA6.1
Gross margin3.3
Op margin6.0
Net margin5.5
Current ratio7.0
FCF quality6.1
Moat6.9
Piotroski F10.0
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 9/9

Growth

4.6/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth4.3
EPS growth4.9

Momentum

5.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD10.0
OBV1.0
MA position8.0
Volume4.2
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat

Sentiment

6.6/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment6.2
Analyst rating7.0
Price target6.5

Insider

2.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
materiality4.5
insider conviction2.0
holder change2.1
notable moves3.0
  • ▸Modest insider selling — $2,296,126 (0.035% of mkt cap)
  • ▸Institutions reducing

Peer rank

6.3/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank7.3
quality rank6.5
growth rank5.3
  • ▸Attractive P/E vs peers

Technical

4.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger3.1
support resistance3.4
52w position6.2

Risk (lower is worse)

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest6.2
days to cover4.4
volatility3.6
put call10.0
implied vol3.7
max pain risk3.0
beta9.5
debt equity7.7
news risk6.0
  • ▸Above max pain $30

Catalyst

7.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history10.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg5.2
dividend safety8.5
news activity8.0
  • ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
  • ▸Earnings in 7 days
  • ▸Dividend aristocrat: 1.9% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (5)
  • MOMENTUM:5.6>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:-0.3=NEGATIVE
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:7d<=7d
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
-0.26
Upside
-3.9%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 68, MACD bullish

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output fired on the hard insider floor: insider score of 2.9 sits below the 3.0 threshold (heavy insider selling), which triggers SELL regardless of other dimensions. Co-occurring failed gates ( ASYMMETRY:-0.3=NEGATIVE, EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:7d<=7d) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is -0.26 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 7.9, Catalyst at 7.0, and Sentiment at 6.6; the weakest are Insider at 2.9, Technical at 4.2, and Growth at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.26 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Deep Value Margin Of Safety

    Trip ifConsensus forward EPS estimates are cut by more than 35% cumulatively over 4 quarters, raising the implied forward P/E above 10x and eliminating the apparent valuation discount.

  • P2Perfect Four Quarter Beat Streak

    Trip ifEPS falls below consensus in any 1 of the next 2 reported quarters, breaking the positive streak.

  • P3Strong Cash Generation Balance Sheet

    Trip ifFree-cash-flow to net-income ratio falls below 80% for 2 consecutive reported annual periods.

  • P4Technical Downtrend Two Gate Block

    Trip ifStock reclaims and holds above its 200-day moving average for 3 consecutive weeks with on-balance volume turning positive.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › G › Why this verdict