Value
5.8/10data confidence 83%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 5.8 |
| P/S | 8.2 |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.9 |
| Fwd P/E | 7.1 |
| PEG | 4.6 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 17.6x
- ▸PEG: 1.92
ERIE · Why this verdict
Why Erie Indemnity (ERIE) is rated BUY WAIT
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score5.1/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Erie Indemnity is in a confirmed technical downtrend — the 200-day moving average is declining at close to 7% per month and a death-cross pattern has triggered a hard block — while the price target offers only 2.5% of headroom at a 0.4-to-1 risk/reward ratio; high-severity customer and product concentration risks compound the setup, and the most recent quarter was a miss following two consecutive beats.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The company derives its business predominantly from a single exchange customer and concentrates roughly 71% of its product mix in personal lines, creating two high-severity concentration risks flagged in the annual filing. Bear case | Personal-lines share of total premiums falls below 65% for 2 consecutive quarters as the business diversifies its product mix. | →Stable |
| CounterA concentrated focus on personal lines through a dedicated exchange relationship can deliver operational efficiency and underwriting consistency; not all concentration is fragility if the relationship is structurally durable. | ||
A death-cross formation has triggered a hard technical block, the 200-day moving average is declining at close to 7% per month, and on-balance volume is falling — all consistent with a confirmed downtrend rather than a temporary pullback. Engine gate (failed) | The 200-day moving average slope turns positive for 2 consecutive months while price trades above it, signaling a genuine trend reversal. | →Stable |
| CounterMACD is improving and RSI is at a neutral 51, suggesting internal momentum may be bottoming; if broader conditions turn constructive, this setup could recover faster than the moving-average crossover alone implies. | ||
The price target offers only 2.5% of headroom from current levels, and the reward-to-risk ratio of 0.4-to-1 is clearly unfavorable — the potential upside is a fraction of the potential downside, making new entry unattractive. Price targets | Upside to the price target expands above 10% through a price pullback or a significant analyst target upgrade. | →Stable |
| CounterA stock with limited stated upside to the technical target may simply need a target revision upward; if the company delivers a strong earnings beat, analyst targets could be raised, restoring asymmetry from current levels. | ||
The last four quarters produced two beats and two misses, with the most recent quarter missing consensus estimates by roughly 5%; this inconsistency limits the earnings-catalyst premium that would otherwise be warranted. Earnings | EPS surprise exceeds 0% for 3 consecutive quarters, restoring a reliable positive-surprise pattern. | →Stable |
| CounterThe average EPS surprise across the four quarters was still positive at roughly 16.5%, driven by a large beat in the prior period; a single miss does not break the overall trend if the next print returns to positive territory. | ||
The company derives its business predominantly from a single exchange customer and concentrates roughly 71% of its product mix in personal lines, creating two high-severity concentration risks flagged in the annual filing.
→StableBear case
- Expectation
- Personal-lines share of total premiums falls below 65% for 2 consecutive quarters as the business diversifies its product mix.
CounterA concentrated focus on personal lines through a dedicated exchange relationship can deliver operational efficiency and underwriting consistency; not all concentration is fragility if the relationship is structurally durable.
A death-cross formation has triggered a hard technical block, the 200-day moving average is declining at close to 7% per month, and on-balance volume is falling — all consistent with a confirmed downtrend rather than a temporary pullback.
→StableEngine gate (failed)
- Expectation
- The 200-day moving average slope turns positive for 2 consecutive months while price trades above it, signaling a genuine trend reversal.
CounterMACD is improving and RSI is at a neutral 51, suggesting internal momentum may be bottoming; if broader conditions turn constructive, this setup could recover faster than the moving-average crossover alone implies.
The price target offers only 2.5% of headroom from current levels, and the reward-to-risk ratio of 0.4-to-1 is clearly unfavorable — the potential upside is a fraction of the potential downside, making new entry unattractive.
→StablePrice targets
- Expectation
- Upside to the price target expands above 10% through a price pullback or a significant analyst target upgrade.
CounterA stock with limited stated upside to the technical target may simply need a target revision upward; if the company delivers a strong earnings beat, analyst targets could be raised, restoring asymmetry from current levels.
The last four quarters produced two beats and two misses, with the most recent quarter missing consensus estimates by roughly 5%; this inconsistency limits the earnings-catalyst premium that would otherwise be warranted.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- EPS surprise exceeds 0% for 3 consecutive quarters, restoring a reliable positive-surprise pattern.
CounterThe average EPS surprise across the four quarters was still positive at roughly 16.5%, driven by a large beat in the prior period; a single miss does not break the overall trend if the next print returns to positive territory.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
6.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 8.3 |
| ROA | 9.4 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 7.6 |
| Net margin | 7.0 |
| Current ratio | 4.7 |
| FCF quality | 6.2 |
| Moat | 6.4 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9
Growth
2.9/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 3.2 |
| EPS growth | 2.6 |
Momentum
4.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.2 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 7.5 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 75)
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-MA but MA slope flat/negative + RSI 75 (late-cycle distribution risk)
Sentiment
5.0/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
5.2/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 5.4 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
Peer rank
5.8/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.7 |
| quality rank | 6.2 |
| growth rank | 2.0 |
- ▸Conservative debt levels
Technical
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 2.2 |
| support resistance | 1.8 |
| 52w position | 5.6 |
| gap | 5.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
6.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 5.0 |
| days to cover | 0.0 |
| volatility | 5.4 |
| put call | 10.0 |
| implied vol | 5.5 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 9.9 |
- ▸Above max pain $195
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
6.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 6.7 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| dividend safety | 7.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/1M
- ▸Earnings today
- ▸Dividend aristocrat: 2.4% yield
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Earnings today. Wait until post-earnings.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L3:NEWS_BLOCK|ENTRY_STICKY:WITHIN_BANDPassed (5)
- MOMENTUM:4.5>=4.5
- INSIDER:OK
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:0d<=7d
Warning (3)
- MOMENTUM:4.5<5.5 (soft — BUY_NOW allowed but watch)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
- 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
13.6%
Sizing output
STARTER
SetupRecovery — Death cross but MACD improving, RSI 75
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityModerate — Balanced profile
Investment implication
A recent news event triggered an L3 news-block on the verdict path. Trigger: Earnings today. Wait until post-earnings. The 10-dimension scores remain Catalyst at 6.7 (strongest), but DEATH_CROSS:HARD_BLOCK also fails — the news block is the proximate trigger, not the sole driver.
The strongest dimensions are Catalyst at 6.7, Quality at 6.4, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.1; the weakest are Growth at 2.9, Technical at 3.6, and Momentum at 4.5. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 3 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Death Cross Confirmed Downtrend
Trip if200-day moving average slope turns positive (greater than 0% per month) for 2 consecutive months while price trades above it.
- P2Exhausted Upside Poor Risk Reward
Trip ifUpside to analyst price target expands above 10% through a price pullback or analyst target upgrade.
- P3Customer Product Concentration
Trip ifPersonal-lines share of premiums falls below 60% for 2 consecutive reporting periods.
- P4Mixed Earnings Track Record
Trip ifEPS surprise exceeds 0% for 3 consecutive quarters.