Value
9.0/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
- ▸Attractively valued
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Dakota Gold is a pre-revenue gold developer with large analyst upside and an out-of-favor sector, but weak quality, cash burn, a downtrend and poor earnings surprises keep it speculative.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
At $5.27 the stock has 102.4% upside to the $10.66 analyst target against 11.3% downside to the $4.95 support level, a reward-to-risk of 9.04. Upside pct | Price moves toward the analyst target while holding above support. | →Stable |
| CounterOnly 6 analysts cover the stock and the company has no revenue, so the target rests on project estimates rather than reported results. | ||
The Basic Materials sector is out of favor and the value score is 9.0/10, with the stock flagged as attractively valued. Edge rationale | Sector rotation into gold producers lifts valuation over 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterCheap on paper, but with revenue at $0 in all five reported quarters the value score reflects asset estimates, not earnings. | ||
Free cash flow is negative, the company has no moat and quality scores 1.6/10, well below a 4.0 minimum. Quality breakdown | Quality improves as the project advances toward production. | →Stable |
| CounterInstitutions are accumulating and debt levels are conservative, so the cash burn may be affordable development spending. | ||
The stock is below its 200-day average, but that average is still rising at 1.3% per 30 days, which reads as a pullback in an uptrend, with momentum scored 2.1/10. Momentum breakdown | The 200-day average keeps rising while price recovers above it. | ↑Improving |
| CounterFalling on-balance volume shows distribution, which suggests the pullback could turn into a confirmed downtrend. | ||
EPS missed in 2 of the last 4 quarters with surprises of -22.1% and -12.46% recently and -350% in November 2025, an average of -89.32%. Last 4 quarters | EPS surprises turn positive over the next four reports. | →Stable |
| CounterA March 2026 beat of 27.27% shows the misses can reverse, and pre-revenue loss estimates are hard to forecast. | ||
CounterOnly 6 analysts cover the stock and the company has no revenue, so the target rests on project estimates rather than reported results.
CounterCheap on paper, but with revenue at $0 in all five reported quarters the value score reflects asset estimates, not earnings.
CounterInstitutions are accumulating and debt levels are conservative, so the cash burn may be affordable development spending.
CounterFalling on-balance volume shows distribution, which suggests the pullback could turn into a confirmed downtrend.
CounterA March 2026 beat of 27.27% shows the misses can reverse, and pre-revenue loss estimates are hard to forecast.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst target | 9.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 4.8 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 3.9 |
| OBV | 6.3 |
| MA position | 7.0 |
| Volume | 2.5 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 7.6 |
| Price target | 10.0 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 8.8 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.0 |
| quality rank | 1.4 |
| growth rank | 5.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 5.0 |
| support resistance | 5.1 |
| 52w position | 5.6 |
| gap | 6.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.3 |
| days to cover | 6.3 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 0.0 |
| implied vol | 7.8 |
| beta | 6.0 |
| debt equity | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 1.1 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
Quality below minimum threshold.
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORnone
SetupRange Bound — RSI 44 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeSector Rotation — Basic Materials sector out of favor, value=9.0
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.8B<$5B
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects clean gate clearance against Value at 9.0 and asymmetric R:R of 8.72.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.0, Sentiment at 7.7, and Insider at 5.6; the weakest are Quality at 1.6, Catalyst at 2.8, and Peer rank at 5.0. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 3 warnings, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 8.72 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifShare price falls below the $4.95 support level.
Trip ifValue score falls below 6.0 from the current 9.0.
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 from the current 1.6.
Trip ifThe 200-day moving average slope falls below 0% per 30 days from the current +1.3%.
Trip ifEPS surprise stays above 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.