China fabric sourcing
“10-K Item 1: 'approximately 60% of the fabric that was used in the manufacture of our products was sourced from China'”
Updated
The most significant concentration Carter's discloses is China fabric sourcing at 60%, classified HIGH by disclosed size. Below: the full set from the latest 10-K — verbatim quotes, filing references, and a synthesis of what these exposures mean together.
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Source: Carter's’s SEC Form 10-K filed — view the filing on SEC EDGAR ↗
Each card carries a disclosed-size chip (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW — how large the exposure is as a share of revenue, not how dangerous it is) and a nature tag: Built-in(the company’s own model, geography, or products) or Outside party (an external customer, supplier, or distributor it relies on).
“10-K Item 1: 'approximately 60% of the fabric that was used in the manufacture of our products was sourced from China'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Our two largest wholesale customers accounted for 11.0% and 10.3%, respectively, of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2025.'”
“10-K Item 1: 'Our two largest wholesale customers accounted for 11.0% and 10.3%, respectively, of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2025.'”
Carter's concentration exposures split between a high-share supply dependency and modest customer-level exposures. Approximately 60% of the fabric used in manufacturing was sourced from China, a high-share dependency that leaves the business exposed to disruption in a single sourcing geography. On the customer side, the two largest wholesale customers accounted for 11.0% and 10.3% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2025, respectively — modest shares individually, and even combined they represent only about a fifth of net sales, spreading wholesale revenue across a broader base than the fabric-sourcing exposure would suggest. The China fabric dependency is the exposure most likely to move the verdict: it is both larger in share and tied to a single sourcing country, making it vulnerable to tariff changes, trade disruption, or supply-chain shocks in a way the customer base is not. By contrast, the wholesale customer concentrations, while real dependency risks, are modest enough in scale that the loss of either customer would be a meaningful but not existential event for the business.
For the engine’s reasoning on CRI’s current verdict — including which dimensions drove the score — see the per-dimension breakdown.
| Symbol | Name | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRI● | Carter's, Inc. | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| BKE | Buckle, Inc. (The) | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| ANF | Abercrombie & Fitch Company | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| AEO | American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| BOOT | Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| BURL | Burlington Stores, Inc. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concentration counts reflect items disclosed in each peer’s most recent 10-K; disclosed-size classification uses TrendMatrix’s internal 10-K extraction taxonomy.