Skip to main content
CNNECannae Holdings, Inc.Sell4.4·$16.85
CNNE · Why this verdict

Why Cannae Holdings (CNNE) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score4.4/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Cannae Holdings is a small restaurant-focused holding company with a breakout chart and a 3.7% dividend, but quality is far below the floor, revenue is shrinking, earnings have missed in most recent quarters, and the price is already above the analyst target.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Quality scores 1.4, below the 4.0 floor, with return and margin components at 0.0 and a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Margin and return components should move off 0.0 and the Piotroski score should rise above 4 over the next 12 months.

CounterA current ratio score of 4.7 and conservative debt levels suggest the balance sheet is not stressed, and a holding company's investment gains can swing results sharply upward.

Revenue is declining 7%, and quarterly revenue of $102.2M is down from $110.2M a year earlier and well below $143.6M in September 2023.

→Stable
Growth breakdown
Expectation
Quarterly revenue should stabilize above $100M and return toward year-over-year growth.

CounterQuarterly revenue has stabilized in a $96M to $110M band for the last 5 quarters, so the steep decline may be largely over after earlier portfolio changes.

EPS missed estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, including a -$1.93 result against a -$0.37 estimate in February 2026, with average surprise of -107%.

↑Improving
Last 4 quarters
Expectation
EPS should stop missing and the loss per share should narrow toward estimates in the report due in 16 days.

CounterThe August 2026 quarter swung to a $0.86 profit against a -$0.42 estimate, so the trend may be turning even though earlier quarters were deeply negative.

Price of $16.29 is above the $14.66 analyst target (upside of -10.0%), so there is no analyst-supported upside at the current level.

→Stable
Analyst target
Expectation
Analyst targets should be raised toward the current price, or the price should consolidate back toward the target, over the next 12 months.

CounterOnly 2 analysts cover the stock, so the target is a thin signal, and a breakout with rising on-balance volume can keep running past a stale target.

Momentum scores 6.8 with rising on-balance volume, the price is above its 200-day average, and the stock yields 3.7%.

↑Improving
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
Price should hold above its 200-day average with volume accumulation continuing while the dividend stays covered.

CounterWith near-zero margins and weak quality, the dividend and the breakout both depend on non-operating gains rather than earnings, and short interest of 10% shows skeptics are active.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

9.1/10data confidence 20%
ComponentSub-score
P/S9.1
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

1.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE0.0
ROA0.0
Gross margin0.0
Op margin0.0
Net margin0.0
Current ratio4.7
Moat4.0
Piotroski F2.2
  • ▸No competitive moat
  • ▸Weak Piotroski F-Score: 2/9
  • ▸Quality concerns

Growth

0.7/10data confidence 33%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth0.7
  • ▸Declining revenue: -7%

Momentum

7.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.0
MACD8.0
OBV10.0
MA position9.0
Volume3.5
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

5.1/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
Analyst rating5.0
Price target5.4
erm sentiment5.0

Insider

4.8/10data confidence 50%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change4.7
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

3.9/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank5.7
quality rank0.0
growth rank0.3
  • ▸Conservative debt levels

Technical

2.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger0.0
support resistance0.2
52w position8.5

Risk (lower is worse)

6.0/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest5.1
days to cover4.4
volatility6.5
put call10.0
implied vol3.6
max pain risk3.0
beta6.0
debt equity9.1
  • ▸Above max pain $10

Catalyst

3.8/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history0.0
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg0.0
dividend safety7.7
news activity5.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 1B/3M
  • ▸Earnings in 11 days
  • ▸Dividend aristocrat: 3.7% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Quality below minimum threshold.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOOR
Passed (6)
  • MOMENTUM:7.1>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • 8K:CLEAN
  • NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
  • ASYMMETRY:-1.4=NEGATIVE
Warning (1)
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:11d<=14d (soft)
Reward-to-Risk
-1.38
Upside
-13.0%
Downside
9.4%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupBreakout — Golden cross, above all MAs, RSI 67, MACD bullish

EdgeInst Constrain — Small cap ($0.7B) below institutional reach

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.7B<$5B

Investment implication

The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects the ASYMMETRY gate's -1.4=NEGATIVE outcome against Value at 9.1 and asymmetric R:R of -1.38.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.1, Momentum at 7.1, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.0; the weakest are Growth at 0.7, Quality at 1.4, and Technical at 2.9. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -1.38 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Quality Below Minimum Floor

    Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 from the current 1.4.

  • P2Declining Revenue Trend

    Trip ifQuarterly revenue falls below $96.2M, the lowest level in the last 5 quarters, from the current $102.2M.

  • P3Persistent Earnings Misses

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays below 0% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P4Analyst Target Already Exceeded

    Trip ifAnalyst target rises above $17.10, giving more than 5% upside from the current $16.29.

  • P5Breakout Momentum With Dividend

    Trip ifMomentum score falls below 4.5 from the current 6.8.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › CNNE › Why this verdict