Value
8.0/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/E | 9.4 |
| P/S | 9.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.7 |
| Fwd P/E | 9.8 |
| PEG | 10.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Forward P/E: 6.2x
- ▸PEG: 0.29
- ▸Attractively valued
CCSI · Why this verdict
Why Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI) is rated BUY WAIT
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictBUY WAIT
Overall score5.9/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The engine explicitly flags this as a high-quality business, citing strong margins of 25% and a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9, even though it fails the Rule of 40 growth-plus-margin test. Quality breakdown | Piotroski F-Score should hold at 7 or higher and margins should stay above 20% over the next 4 quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterFailing the Rule of 40 test signals the business isn't growing fast enough to offset its margin profile, which can foreshadow gradual quality erosion even if current-period metrics look strong. | ||
The stock trades at a 6.3x forward P/E with a 0.29 PEG ratio, an attractively valued setup that pushed the value score to 8.0. Valuation breakdown | PEG should stay below 0.5 and forward P/E below 8x over the next 12 months to sustain this valuation case. | →Stable |
| CounterA persistently low multiple for a declining-category fax/cloud communications business can reflect the market correctly pricing in secular demand erosion rather than an overlooked bargain. | ||
The put/call ratio sits elevated at 2.80, a level the engine flags as a key risk signaling heavy bearish or hedging positioning in the options market. Key risks | The put/call ratio should normalize back below 1.5 over the next quarter if the current hedging pressure eases. | →Stable |
| CounterA high put/call ratio can also reflect institutional holders buying protective puts around an otherwise bullish core position, rather than outright bearish speculation. | ||
The company has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of its last reported quarters, and analyst estimates have risen 7.6% over the past 30 days, a positive combination the engine credits as a catalyst. Catalyst breakdown | The beat streak should extend through the next 2 reported quarters with estimates continuing to trend up. | →Stable |
| CounterRising estimates after a beat streak can already be priced into the stock, meaning the next print needs to beat an even higher bar to keep driving the catalyst score higher. | ||
The engine explicitly flags this as a high-quality business, citing strong margins of 25% and a Piotroski F-Score of 8 out of 9, even though it fails the Rule of 40 growth-plus-margin test.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Piotroski F-Score should hold at 7 or higher and margins should stay above 20% over the next 4 quarters.
CounterFailing the Rule of 40 test signals the business isn't growing fast enough to offset its margin profile, which can foreshadow gradual quality erosion even if current-period metrics look strong.
The stock trades at a 6.3x forward P/E with a 0.29 PEG ratio, an attractively valued setup that pushed the value score to 8.0.
→StableValuation breakdown
- Expectation
- PEG should stay below 0.5 and forward P/E below 8x over the next 12 months to sustain this valuation case.
CounterA persistently low multiple for a declining-category fax/cloud communications business can reflect the market correctly pricing in secular demand erosion rather than an overlooked bargain.
The put/call ratio sits elevated at 2.80, a level the engine flags as a key risk signaling heavy bearish or hedging positioning in the options market.
→StableKey risks
- Expectation
- The put/call ratio should normalize back below 1.5 over the next quarter if the current hedging pressure eases.
CounterA high put/call ratio can also reflect institutional holders buying protective puts around an otherwise bullish core position, rather than outright bearish speculation.
The company has beaten earnings estimates in all 4 of its last reported quarters, and analyst estimates have risen 7.6% over the past 30 days, a positive combination the engine credits as a catalyst.
→StableCatalyst breakdown
- Expectation
- The beat streak should extend through the next 2 reported quarters with estimates continuing to trend up.
CounterRising estimates after a beat streak can already be priced into the stock, meaning the next print needs to beat an even higher bar to keep driving the catalyst score higher.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Consensus Cloud Solutions screens cheap with high-quality margins and a perfect earnings beat streak backed by rising estimates, but an elevated put/call ratio and a below-floor risk score flagged by the engine argue for caution despite the fundamentals.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
7.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROA | 9.6 |
| Gross margin | 10.0 |
| Op margin | 10.0 |
| Net margin | 10.0 |
| Current ratio | 6.4 |
| FCF quality | 6.4 |
| Moat | 5.4 |
| Rule of 40 | 3.0 |
| Piotroski F | 8.9 |
- ▸Strong margins: 25%
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Rule of 40: 24 (fail)
- ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 8/9
Growth
4.6/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 2.9 |
| EPS growth | 6.3 |
Momentum
3.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 5.5 |
| MACD | 1.9 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 0.5 |
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
5.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.7 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
Insider
7.2/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 4.5 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
- ▸Modest insider selling — $137,080 (0.020% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
4.5/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 8.3 |
| quality rank | 8.8 |
| growth rank | 0.9 |
- ▸Attractive P/E vs peers
- ▸Best-in-class margins
Technical
5.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 4.1 |
| support resistance | 5.5 |
| 52w position | 7.5 |
| gap | 6.0 |
Risk (lower is worse)
3.1/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.8 |
| days to cover | 5.5 |
| volatility | 0.2 |
| put call | 5.6 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| max pain risk | 3.0 |
| beta | 3.7 |
| debt equity | 0.0 |
- ▸High IV: 112%
- ▸Above max pain $25
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
6.8/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 6.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 6.1 |
- ▸Perfect beat streak: 4Q
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Fundamentals strong but target reached (-10.9% upside).
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L4:PATH_A_VALUE_MOS33|V8:TARGET_REACHEDPassed (6)
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:30d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
- MOMENTUM:3.6<4.5
- ASYMMETRY:-0.9=NEGATIVE
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
-0.93
Upside
-10.9%
Downside
11.8%
Sizing output
STARTER
SetupRange Bound — RSI 58 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band
EdgeTemporary headwind — High quality (7.7) with weak momentum (3.6)
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.90>1.3, MCap $0.7B<$5B
Investment implication
The STRONG_BUY_WAIT verdict reflects the MOMENTUM gate's 3.6<4.5 outcome against Value at 8.0 and asymmetric R:R of -0.93.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.0, Quality at 7.7, and Insider at 7.2; the weakest are Risk (lower is worse) at 3.1, Momentum at 3.6, and Peer rank at 4.5. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.93 and an engine sizing output of STARTER.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Cheap Valuation Strong Fundamentals
Trip ifForward P/E rises above 10x or PEG exceeds 0.6.
- P2High Quality Business With Strong Margins
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 5 out of 9.
- P3Elevated Put Call Hedging Risk
Trip ifPut/call ratio stays above 2.5 for 2 more consecutive months.
- P4Perfect Earnings Beat With Rising Estimates
Trip ifAverage earnings surprise falls below 0% in 2 of its next 4 reported quarters.