Value
10.0/10data confidence 20%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 10.0 |
- ▸Attractively valued
ASTL · Why this verdict
Why Algoma Steel Group (ASTL) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score4.8/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Algoma Steel is deeply cheap on price-to-sales in an out-of-favor sector, but it burns cash at -19% of revenue, has missed earnings in 3 of the last 4 quarters and has shrinking sales.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Algoma is cash-burning, with free cash flow at -19% of revenue and a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, which pushes quality to 1.6 versus the 4.0 floor. Quality breakdown | Free cash flow margin improves toward breakeven over the next 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterSteel is capital-intensive, and a recovery in volumes could swing cash flow quickly given the high operating leverage. | ||
The company missed earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, with an average surprise of -31%. Earnings | EPS losses narrow and results meet or beat estimates. | ↑Improving |
| CounterThe latest quarter was a 55% beat with a loss of 0.36 per share versus 0.80 expected, which may mark an inflection. | ||
Quarterly revenue fell from $589.7M to $267.5M over five quarters, and the next quarter is estimated near $221.3M, so sales are still contracting. Revenue quarters | Quarterly revenue stabilizes above $250M. | ↑Improving |
| CounterRevenue figures are provisional from yfinance, and price or volume swings in steel can reverse quickly. | ||
Basic Materials is out of favor and the stock scores 10.0 on value, so cheapness is the main reason to own it. Edge rationale | Sector rotation into materials re-rates the shares. | →Stable |
| CounterValue confidence is just 0.2, and price-to-sales is a poor measure for a loss-making business. | ||
Algoma is cash-burning, with free cash flow at -19% of revenue and a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, which pushes quality to 1.6 versus the 4.0 floor.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- Free cash flow margin improves toward breakeven over the next 12 months.
CounterSteel is capital-intensive, and a recovery in volumes could swing cash flow quickly given the high operating leverage.
The company missed earnings estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters, with an average surprise of -31%.
↑ImprovingEarnings
- Expectation
- EPS losses narrow and results meet or beat estimates.
CounterThe latest quarter was a 55% beat with a loss of 0.36 per share versus 0.80 expected, which may mark an inflection.
Quarterly revenue fell from $589.7M to $267.5M over five quarters, and the next quarter is estimated near $221.3M, so sales are still contracting.
↑ImprovingRevenue quarters
- Expectation
- Quarterly revenue stabilizes above $250M.
CounterRevenue figures are provisional from yfinance, and price or volume swings in steel can reverse quickly.
Basic Materials is out of favor and the stock scores 10.0 on value, so cheapness is the main reason to own it.
→StableEdge rationale
- Expectation
- Sector rotation into materials re-rates the shares.
CounterValue confidence is just 0.2, and price-to-sales is a poor measure for a loss-making business.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
1.6/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 8.5 |
| FCF quality | 0.0 |
| Moat | 2.5 |
| Piotroski F | 2.2 |
- ▸Cash-burning: FCF -19% of revenue
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Weak Piotroski F-Score: 2/9
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
5.0/10data confidence 50%Momentum
6.9/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 4.3 |
| MACD | 8.1 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 9.0 |
| Volume | 2.9 |
- ▸Overbought (RSI 75)
- ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
4.8/10data confidence 67%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 4.5 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
Insider
5.0/10data confidence 50%Peer rank
1.6/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 6.4 |
| quality rank | 0.0 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
Technical
2.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 0.0 |
| support resistance | 0.7 |
| 52w position | 6.7 |
Risk (lower is worse)
3.2/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.2 |
| days to cover | 4.0 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| put call | 5.3 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 4.5 |
| debt equity | 1.3 |
- ▸High IV: 107%
Catalyst
4.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 3.3 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 0.0 |
| news activity | 8.0 |
- ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCK:QUALITY_FLOORPassed (6)
- MOMENTUM:6.9>=5.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:104d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (0)
none
Warning (1)
- ASYMMETRY:UPSIDE_EXHAUSTED (upside=0.0%)
Reward-to-Risk
0.00
Upside
+0.0%
Downside
15.0%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeSector Rotation — Basic Materials sector out of favor, value=10.0
SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.65>1.3, MCap $0.5B<$5B
Investment implication
The SELL_IF_HOLDING verdict reflects clean gate clearance against Value at 10.0 and asymmetric R:R of 0.00.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 10.0, Momentum at 6.9, and Growth at 5.0; the weakest are Peer rank at 1.6, Quality at 1.6, and Technical at 2.5. The V9 engine cleared all gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.00 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Cash Burning Operations
Trip ifFree cash flow margin rises above -5% of revenue from the current -19%.
- P2Repeated Earnings Misses
Trip ifEPS beats estimates in at least 2 consecutive quarters.
- P3Shrinking Revenue
Trip ifQuarterly revenue rises above $350M from the latest $267.5M.
- P4Out Of Favor Sector Value
Trip ifValue score falls below 6.0 from the current 10.0.