Skip to main content
ALVAutoliv, Inc.Sell5.6·$115.55
ALV · Why this verdict

Why Autoliv (ALV) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score5.6/10
ConfidenceHIGH
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Autoliv has delivered four consecutive earnings beats with consistent positive surprises averaging nearly 10% and trades at a forward earnings multiple of 10.5x with a PEG of 0.37 — a meaningful discount to its growth rate; however, momentum sits just below the threshold for a constructive technical setup, top-ten customers account for 70% of revenue, and only about 3% of upside remains to the price target, keeping the near-term risk/reward thin even as the longer-term franchise quality is evident.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

The company has beaten consensus EPS estimates in all four of the past four quarters, with the three most recent beats clustering tightly around an 11% upside surprise — a pattern suggestive of reliable, repeatable guidance discipline rather than occasional outperformance.

↓Deteriorating
Earnings
Expectation
The beat streak extends to six consecutive quarters and the average surprise remains above 5%, confirming that guidance discipline is structural rather than coincidental.

CounterFour beats with narrow dispersion can reflect a period when consensus was set conservatively; if analysts recalibrate their models upward following continued beats, the positive surprise rate could narrow or reverse without any underlying business deterioration.

A forward earnings multiple of 10.5x alongside a PEG ratio of 0.37 means the market is pricing the stock at well under half its earnings growth rate — a discount that peers on both price-to-earnings and return-on-equity screens consistently show to be unusually wide.

→Stable
Valuation breakdown
Expectation
The forward multiple re-rates toward 15x as the earnings beat streak continues and the technical setup resolves, partially closing the discount to growth.

CounterAuto-parts companies structurally trade at low multiples because their earnings are cyclical and closely tied to global vehicle production volumes; the apparent discount may simply price in the inherent cyclicality rather than representing a genuine undervaluation.

The ten largest customers account for 70% of revenue, creating material exposure to the loss, renegotiation, or platform-level shift of even a single major account — a structural risk that reduces pricing power and amplifies cyclical sensitivity during industry downturns.

→Stable
Bear case
Expectation
Top-ten customer revenue concentration falls below 60% over the next two annual reporting periods, reflecting diversification into new accounts or geographies.

CounterDeep integration with major global automotive manufacturers often reflects switching-cost advantages rather than vulnerability; customers that have qualified a supplier for safety-critical components rarely switch without substantial cost and certification burden.

Price momentum sits just below the 4.5 threshold for a constructive technical setup, with on-balance volume trending lower despite the stock remaining above its 200-day moving average — a split signal indicating that while the longer-term trend is intact, near-term buying conviction is absent.

↓Deteriorating
Momentum breakdown
Expectation
On-balance volume turns positive and holds for four or more consecutive weeks while RSI rises above 55, signaling that distribution has given way to accumulation.

CounterA stock above its 200-day moving average with momentum approaching but not yet at the minimum threshold is closer to entry-ready than it might appear; positive news flow or an earnings catalyst could close the gap quickly.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

8.3/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
P/E8.2
P/S9.8
EV/EBITDA7.9
Fwd P/E9.3
PEG10.0
Analyst target5.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 10.1x
  • ▸PEG: 0.27
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

4.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE8.3
ROA5.6
Gross margin0.0
Op margin3.9
Net margin2.8
Current ratio4.1
FCF quality9.2
Moat4.2
Piotroski F4.4
  • ▸Excellent cash conversion: 125% FCF/NI
  • ▸No competitive moat

Growth

6.0/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth2.4
EPS growth9.6
  • ▸Declining revenue: -0%

Momentum

4.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI3.8
MACD10.0
OBV1.0
MA position5.0
Volume2.1
  • ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
  • ▸Below 200-MA (recent, shallow — too early to call)

Sentiment

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment5.8
Analyst rating7.3
Price target6.9

Insider

3.9/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change3.8
notable moves3.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.6/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank6.1
quality rank7.4
growth rank1.3
  • ▸Superior ROE vs peers

Technical

4.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger3.5
support resistance3.1
52w position7.6

Risk (lower is worse)

6.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest6.6
days to cover4.9
volatility6.3
put call10.0
implied vol6.3
max pain risk7.0
beta5.4
debt equity5.9
news risk3.5
  • ▸Concentration risks: 1 HIGH, 2 MED (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

5.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm3.5
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg4.9
dividend safety8.0
news activity8.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
  • ▸Dividend aristocrat: 3.0% yield

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Multiple concerning factors. Consider reducing position.

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_SELL
Passed (4)
  • INSIDER:OK
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:91d clear
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (3)
  • MOMENTUM:4.4<4.5
  • ASYMMETRY:0.3<1.5@spot
  • 8K_SERIOUS:2.05
Warning (0)

none

Reward-to-Risk
0.32
Upside
+2.3%
Downside
7.3%
Sizing output
AVOID

Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — Beta 1.40>1.3

Investment implication

The F-path SELL output reflects an overall score of 3.6 below the 5.6 soft trigger — multiple weakening dimensions accumulated rather than a single hard-floor breach. The strongest dimension ( Value at 8.3) was not enough to lift the adjusted overall above the threshold. Co-occurring failed gates ( MOMENTUM:4.4<4.5, ASYMMETRY:0.3<1.5@spot, 8K_SERIOUS:2.05) reinforce the read. Current asymmetry R:R is 0.32 — supplementary context, not the trigger for this path.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.3, Sentiment at 6.7, and Risk (lower is worse) at 6.2; the weakest are Insider at 3.9, Momentum at 4.4, and Peer rank at 4.6. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 0.32 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1Four Quarter Consistent Beat Streak

    Trip ifEPS surprise falls below 0% in 2 of the next 4 reported quarters, breaking the beat streak.

  • P2Valuation Discount To Earnings Growth

    Trip ifForward P/E expands above 18x or PEG ratio rises above 1.0, removing the valuation discount.

  • P3Customer Concentration Top Ten

    Trip ifTop-ten customer share of revenue falls below 55% for 2 consecutive annual reporting periods.

  • P4Tepid Momentum Volume Distribution

    Trip ifOn-balance volume turns positive and RSI rises above 55 for 4 or more consecutive weeks, confirming accumulation has replaced distribution.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › ALV › Why this verdict