Value
1.8/10data confidence 33%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
- ▸Expensive valuation
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
Alamar is a hypergrowth, wide-moat medical-device company whose price has already reached the analyst target, leaving an expensive valuation and heavy insider selling. The growth is real, but the price offers almost no margin of safety.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
Growth is exceptional at 82% year over year, with quarterly revenue of $29.4M versus $16.2M a year earlier. Growth breakdown | Revenue growth should stay above 50% year over year across the next four quarters. | →Stable |
| CounterGrowth confidence is only 0.33 and the earnings history covers a single reported quarter, so the 82% rate may not be a reliable trend. | ||
The company has a wide economic moat and a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9, though the overall quality score is only 4.8. Quality breakdown | The Piotroski score should stay at 6 or higher and operating margin should move toward breakeven over 12 months. | →Stable |
| CounterOperating and net margins both score 0.0 and the peer quality rank is near the bottom, so the moat has not yet produced profits. | ||
The $30.69 price is only 0.4% below the $30.80 analyst target, leaving a reward-to-risk of 0.02 against 15.0% downside to the stop. Upside pct | Analysts should raise targets above the current price as growth continues, restoring meaningful upside. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterWith light analyst coverage and no remaining distance to the target, any growth disappointment leaves the stock exposed to a 15.0% drop. | ||
Valuation is flagged as expensive, with a price-to-sales score of 0.0 and an overall value score of 3.0. Valuation breakdown | Growth should outpace the price so that the value score recovers above 5.0 over 12 months. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterHypergrowth names often hold rich multiples for years, and the 82% growth rate may justify the premium. | ||
Insiders sold $5,949,983 (0.279% of market cap) across 16 transactions in 90 days with no purchases, the latest on 2026-10-20. Net value 90d | Insider selling should taper and net purchases should appear if insiders view the stock as fairly priced. | ↓Deteriorating |
| CounterAt 0.279% of market cap the selling is moderate, and institutions are accumulating at the same time. | ||
CounterGrowth confidence is only 0.33 and the earnings history covers a single reported quarter, so the 82% rate may not be a reliable trend.
CounterOperating and net margins both score 0.0 and the peer quality rank is near the bottom, so the moat has not yet produced profits.
CounterWith light analyst coverage and no remaining distance to the target, any growth disappointment leaves the stock exposed to a 15.0% drop.
CounterHypergrowth names often hold rich multiples for years, and the 82% growth rate may justify the premium.
CounterAt 0.279% of market cap the selling is moderate, and institutions are accumulating at the same time.
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 0.0 |
| Analyst target | 3.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 7.7 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| Moat | 8.0 |
| Piotroski F | 7.8 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Rev growth | 10.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 2.8 |
| MACD | 10.0 |
| OBV | 10.0 |
| MA position | 7.5 |
| Volume | 0.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| LLM sentiment | 6.8 |
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 5.1 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 2.0 |
| insider conviction | 2.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
| notable moves | 7.0 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 0.0 |
| quality rank | 1.0 |
| growth rank | 9.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 1.5 |
| support resistance | 2.7 |
| 52w position | 7.7 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 6.9 |
| days to cover | 7.2 |
| volatility | 0.0 |
| debt equity | 9.3 |
| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
| news activity | 6.0 |
Mixed signals. Hold existing position.
L4:PATH_F_HOLD_DEFAULTnone
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $2.4B<$5B
The default F-path HOLD fired without any positive-conviction gate triggering — no momentum acceleration, no quality+value crossover, no setup recognition. Highest-clear gate: MOMENTUM:6.1>=5.5. Top dim: Growth at 10.0; weakest: Value at 1.8. The engine's read is one of pattern absence — no directional conviction in either direction at current asymmetry.
The strongest dimensions are Growth at 10.0, Catalyst at 7.2, and Momentum at 6.1; the weakest are Value at 1.8, Technical at 4.0, and Peer rank at 4.4. The V9 engine flagged 3 failed gates, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of -0.81 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
Trip ifRevenue growth falls below 40% YoY for 2 consecutive quarters.
Trip ifPiotroski F-Score falls below 5 from current 7.
Trip ifAnalyst target rises above $36 from current $30.80.
Trip ifValue score rises above 5.0 from current 3.0.
Trip ifInsider selling over 90 days falls below 0.1% of market cap from current 0.279%.