Skip to main content
AGMFederal Agricultural Mortgage CSell6.7·$204.13
AGM · Why this verdict

Why Federal Agricultural Mortgage C (AGM) is rated SELL

Updated

Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results. How we score · Editorial policy

Show full disclosure ▾

About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.

Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.

Conflicts and positions. People who build TrendMatrix, or entities they control, may hold positions, long or short, in securities it covers, and may trade them at any time. Positions are not disclosed individually. Verdicts are generated by an automated model applied by the same rules to every covered stock, and are not adjusted for any position held by the people who build TrendMatrix. We do not accept payment from issuers for coverage.

No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security.

No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.

Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.

Methodology · Editorial policy & full disclaimer

VerdictSELL
Overall score6.7/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroRISK_OFF
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis

Engine thesis — one sentence

Federal Agricultural Mortgage offers a high-quality credit services franchise trading at 8.6x forward earnings, but with only 1.8% headroom to the analyst consensus and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.28 to 1, the geometry does not support new capital; extreme counterparty concentration — the top three AgVantage issuers representing over 90% of that segment — and a mixed earnings track record add further caution.

Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.

Thesis pillars

Operating margins of 56% and a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 indicate a structurally sound credit services business with strong balance sheet health and best-in-class margins within its peer group — characteristics that should support earnings stability across credit cycles.

→Stable
Quality breakdown
Expectation
Margins sustain above 50% and the Piotroski score holds at 7+/9 over the next four quarters, confirming that the quality franchise is durable.

CounterEarnings missed in two of the last four quarters with an average surprise of -3.7%; the most recent quarter's beat of 6.7% followed two consecutive misses, making the reliability of income generation less predictable than headline margins suggest.

At a forward P/E of 8.6x and a PEG of 0.84, the stock screens attractively valued on fundamentals — but with just 1.8% headroom to the $186.72 analyst consensus target, the valuation discount has largely played out and the risk/reward of 0.28 to 1 does not support a new position.

↑Improving
Bear case
Expectation
For the investment case to reset favorably, analyst targets would need to be raised materially, restoring at least 10% upside from current price levels.

CounterA golden cross setup with price above all moving averages and a bullish MACD indicates constructive momentum; if earnings consistently beat going forward, analyst targets could be revised higher quickly, reopening the upside case.

The top 10 agricultural finance institutions represent 55% of business, and the top three AgVantage issuers account for over 90% of that segment — a degree of concentration that creates meaningful single-event tail risk if any major counterparty reduces engagement or faces credit stress.

↑Improving
Bear case
Expectation
Top-10 customer concentration declines below 50% as reported in the next annual filing, demonstrating active diversification of the counterparty base.

CounterAgricultural finance is a specialized niche where deep relationships with a concentrated set of institutions are inherent to the market structure; if these relationships are long-standing and stable, the concentration may represent durable franchise economics rather than elevated credit risk.

After an initial beat in the oldest reported quarter, the company posted two consecutive misses before returning to a beat in the most recent period; an average negative surprise of -3.7% over the trailing four quarters signals an inconsistent track record that undermines confidence in forward estimates.

→Stable
Earnings
Expectation
EPS surprises stay positive for 2 consecutive quarters, establishing a trend of reliable delivery that rebuilds confidence in guidance accuracy.

CounterThe most recent quarter's beat of 6.7% was the strongest in the four-period window, and a leadership change flagged in a recent filing may bring improved guidance discipline that makes forward estimates more consistently achievable.

Per-dimension breakdown

Value

8.0/10data confidence 83%
ComponentSub-score
P/E8.8
P/S6.6
Fwd P/E9.5
PEG8.9
Analyst target6.0
  • ▸Forward P/E: 8.8x
  • ▸PEG: 0.68
  • ▸Attractively valued

Quality

6.9/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
ROE4.5
ROA0.4
Gross margin10.0
Op margin10.0
Net margin10.0
Current ratio5.5
Moat6.9
Piotroski F7.8
  • ▸Strong margins: 56%
  • ▸Strong Piotroski F-Score: 7/9

Growth

7.4/10data confidence 67%
ComponentSub-score
Rev growth8.7
EPS growth6.2
  • ▸Strong growth: 25% YoY

Momentum

7.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
RSI5.5
MACD10.0
OBV10.0
MA position4.0
Volume6.7
  • ▸Volume accumulation (rising OBV)
  • ▸Above 200-day MA

Sentiment

6.7/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
LLM sentiment5.0
Analyst rating6.8
Price target8.3
  • ▸Light analyst coverage (3.0) — signal dampened
  • ▸Analyst upside: 26%

Insider

6.2/10data confidence 75%
ComponentSub-score
materiality5.0
holder change6.6
notable moves7.0
  • ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)

Peer rank

4.2/10data confidence 80%
ComponentSub-score
value rank3.9
quality rank6.3
growth rank6.8
  • ▸Best-in-class margins

Technical

6.4/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
bollinger5.5
support resistance7.0
52w position6.6

Risk (lower is worse)

7.2/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
short interest10.0
days to cover10.0
volatility7.2
put call10.0
implied vol6.2
beta6.7
debt equity0.0
  • ▸Concentration risks: 3 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)

Catalyst

4.5/10data confidence 100%
ComponentSub-score
erm5.0
earnings history3.3
earnings timing5.0
surprise avg1.9
dividend safety7.0
news activity5.0
  • ▸Earnings concerns: 2B/2M
  • ▸Earnings in 7 days
  • ▸Dividend: 3.1%

How the verdict was assembled

Engine trigger

Maintain position. Not compelling to add more. | News modifier -2 (HOLD_IF_HOLDING → SELL_IF_HOLDING).

Engine technical detail
verdict_path: L4:PATH_F_HOLD|L3:NEWS_MOD=-2
Passed (4)
  • MOMENTUM:7.2>=5.5
  • INSIDER:OK
  • SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
  • MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (2)
  • ASYMMETRY:1.4<1.5@spot
  • EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:7d<=7d
Warning (1)
  • 8K_CSUITE_CHANGE:5.02 (officer departure/appointment)
Reward-to-Risk
1.40
Upside
+7.0%
Downside
5.0%
Sizing output
AVOID

SetupRange Bound — RSI 44 mid-range, Bollinger mid-band

EdgeNo clear edge — No clear edge identified

SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $2.2B<$5B

Investment implication

None of the engine's positive-conviction paths (C-quality, D-momentum) triggered — the F-path HOLD reflects balanced signals. Strongest-cleared gate: MOMENTUM:7.2>=5.5. Top dim: Value at 8.0; weakest: Peer rank at 4.2. No conviction either direction.

The strongest dimensions are Value at 8.0, Growth at 7.4, and Momentum at 7.2; the weakest are Peer rank at 4.2, Catalyst at 4.5, and Insider at 6.2. The V9 engine flagged 2 failed gates with 1 warning, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 1.40 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.

What would invalidate the thesis

Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.

  • P1High Quality Franchise Margins

    Trip ifOperating margin compresses below 45% for 2 consecutive quarters.

  • P2Valuation Upside Exhausted

    Trip ifUpside to take-profit target exceeds 10% as analyst targets are raised materially above current levels.

  • P3Extreme Counterparty Concentration

    Trip ifTop-10 customer concentration falls below 45% as reported in an annual filing.

  • P4Mixed Earnings Execution

    Trip ifEPS surprise stays above 3% for 2 consecutive quarters, establishing a reliable beat record.

Engine reasoning is mechanically derived from pipeline gate outputs. See decision view.

Home › Stocks › AGM › Why this verdict