Value
9.0/10data confidence 20%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| P/S | 9.0 |
- ▸Attractively valued
ACTG · Why this verdict
Why Acacia Research (ACTG) is rated SELL
Updated
Model-generated analysis — not investment advice. Not a registered investment advisor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Show full disclosure ▾Hide full disclosure ▴
About TrendMatrix. TrendMatrix is a publisher of general securities research and market commentary. We publish on a regular schedule. All content is the same for every subscriber in a tier — we do not provide personalized investment advice and we do not take into account any individual subscriber's financial situation, investment objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, or holdings.
Not investment advice. TrendMatrix is not a registered investment adviser. Our content is for informational and educational purposes only. Consult your own licensed investment adviser, broker, or tax professional before making any investment decision.
Conflicts and positions. The TrendMatrix editorial team frequently holds personal long-term positions in securities discussed. We disclose positions held at the time of publication on each piece. We maintain a trading-window policy: we do not initiate or close positions in the same direction as a TrendMatrix publication within 24 hours before or 72 hours after publication.
No paid promotion. TrendMatrix does not accept payment from any issuer, broker, or third party in exchange for coverage of any security. Our sole compensation is subscription revenue.
No fiduciary duty. No fiduciary, advisory, or agency relationship is created between you and TrendMatrix by reading our content or subscribing to our service.
Performance. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance figures reflect the published model only and do not reflect any individual subscriber's actual results.
VerdictSELL
Overall score5.5/10
ConfidenceMEDIUM
MacroNEUTRAL
Thesis pillars
| Pillar | Expectation | Trend |
|---|---|---|
The quality score of 1.7 sits well below the 4.0 floor cited as grounds to exit the position, with every core profitability component — return on equity, return on assets, gross margin, operating margin, and net margin — reading zero. Quality breakdown | At least some core profitability components should move off zero and the quality score should climb toward the 4.0 floor over the next 12 months for the exit signal to reverse. | →Stable |
| CounterThe current ratio component reads a solid 5.0, suggesting near-term liquidity is not itself a pressing concern even with weak profitability. | ||
The setup failed the momentum gate at 3.1 against a 4.5 threshold, with volume notes describing distribution (falling on-balance volume) even as price holds above its 200-day moving average. Engine gate (failed) | The momentum score should recover back above the 4.5 gate threshold over the next 12 months for the failed-momentum concern to clear. | →Stable |
| CounterThe asymmetry gate passed comfortably at a reward-to-risk ratio of 2.3, and technical notes show maximum readings on both the Bollinger and support/resistance components, suggesting the chart setup is not uniformly weak. | ||
The trailing four-quarter record opens with an in-line result, then runs three consecutive beats, most recently by 22.22%, driving the average surprise up to 54.1%. Earnings | The beat streak should extend into the next reported quarter, due in 32 days, for the improving earnings trend to be considered intact. | →Stable |
| CounterTwo of the three beats were driven by unusually large surprises above 90%, a pace that may not be repeatable and could mean-revert toward smaller surprises or a miss. | ||
Despite the passed asymmetry gate and a 32% analyst-target upside, position sizing is capped at avoid because the roughly $0.4 billion market cap sits below the threshold used for institutional reach. Edge rationale | Market capitalization should grow well beyond the current small-cap level over the next 12 months for the sizing constraint to lift. | →Stable |
| CounterThe strong earnings beat streak and favorable reward-to-risk ratio suggest fundamental improvement that could eventually support a larger market cap. | ||
Risk components show leverage at a debt-to-equity reading of 9.3 and beta pinned at the maximum reading of 10, indicating both high leverage and high sensitivity to market swings. Components | The debt-to-equity and beta components should decline from their current elevated readings over the next 12 months if the risk profile is improving. | →Stable |
| CounterShort interest reads a moderate 7.3 on the risk-component scale with a low days-to-cover of 1.4, suggesting bearish positioning against the stock could unwind quickly if sentiment shifts. | ||
The quality score of 1.7 sits well below the 4.0 floor cited as grounds to exit the position, with every core profitability component — return on equity, return on assets, gross margin, operating margin, and net margin — reading zero.
→StableQuality breakdown
- Expectation
- At least some core profitability components should move off zero and the quality score should climb toward the 4.0 floor over the next 12 months for the exit signal to reverse.
CounterThe current ratio component reads a solid 5.0, suggesting near-term liquidity is not itself a pressing concern even with weak profitability.
The setup failed the momentum gate at 3.1 against a 4.5 threshold, with volume notes describing distribution (falling on-balance volume) even as price holds above its 200-day moving average.
→StableEngine gate (failed)
- Expectation
- The momentum score should recover back above the 4.5 gate threshold over the next 12 months for the failed-momentum concern to clear.
CounterThe asymmetry gate passed comfortably at a reward-to-risk ratio of 2.3, and technical notes show maximum readings on both the Bollinger and support/resistance components, suggesting the chart setup is not uniformly weak.
The trailing four-quarter record opens with an in-line result, then runs three consecutive beats, most recently by 22.22%, driving the average surprise up to 54.1%.
→StableEarnings
- Expectation
- The beat streak should extend into the next reported quarter, due in 32 days, for the improving earnings trend to be considered intact.
CounterTwo of the three beats were driven by unusually large surprises above 90%, a pace that may not be repeatable and could mean-revert toward smaller surprises or a miss.
Despite the passed asymmetry gate and a 32% analyst-target upside, position sizing is capped at avoid because the roughly $0.4 billion market cap sits below the threshold used for institutional reach.
→StableEdge rationale
- Expectation
- Market capitalization should grow well beyond the current small-cap level over the next 12 months for the sizing constraint to lift.
CounterThe strong earnings beat streak and favorable reward-to-risk ratio suggest fundamental improvement that could eventually support a larger market cap.
Risk components show leverage at a debt-to-equity reading of 9.3 and beta pinned at the maximum reading of 10, indicating both high leverage and high sensitivity to market swings.
→StableComponents
- Expectation
- The debt-to-equity and beta components should decline from their current elevated readings over the next 12 months if the risk profile is improving.
CounterShort interest reads a moderate 7.3 on the risk-component scale with a low days-to-cover of 1.4, suggesting bearish positioning against the stock could unwind quickly if sentiment shifts.
TrendMatrix Research · core thesis
Engine thesis — one sentence
Acacia Research has cleared the asymmetry gate with an improving earnings trend, but quality sits well below the exit threshold, momentum has failed its gate, and a small-cap sizing cap keeps the position at avoid.
Falsifiable statement — pillar-level invalidators below. Engine-derived; not personalized advice.
Per-dimension breakdown
Quality
1.7/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| ROE | 0.0 |
| ROA | 0.0 |
| Gross margin | 0.0 |
| Op margin | 0.0 |
| Net margin | 0.0 |
| Current ratio | 5.0 |
| Moat | 4.0 |
| Piotroski F | 4.4 |
- ▸No competitive moat
- ▸Quality concerns
Growth
5.0/10data confidence 50%Momentum
3.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| RSI | 7.9 |
| MACD | 3.5 |
| OBV | 1.0 |
| MA position | 4.0 |
| Volume | 0.5 |
- ▸Uptrend pullback (RSI 36) - buy opportunity
- ▸Volume distribution (falling OBV)
- ▸Above 200-day MA
Sentiment
6.3/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| Analyst rating | 5.0 |
| Price target | 8.9 |
| erm sentiment | 5.0 |
- ▸Analyst upside: 35%
Insider
7.5/10data confidence 50%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| materiality | 5.0 |
| holder change | 10.0 |
- ▸No net insider activity — $0 (0.000% of mkt cap)
- ▸Institutions accumulating
Peer rank
3.7/10data confidence 80%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| value rank | 5.3 |
| quality rank | 1.1 |
| growth rank | 0.0 |
- ▸Conservative debt levels
Technical
8.4/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| bollinger | 9.9 |
| support resistance | 8.5 |
| 52w position | 6.9 |
Risk (lower is worse)
5.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| short interest | 7.3 |
| days to cover | 1.4 |
| volatility | 5.2 |
| implied vol | 0.0 |
| beta | 10.0 |
| debt equity | 9.3 |
- ▸High IV: 110%
- ▸Concentration risks: 2 HIGH (10-K Item 1A — sized via position_sizing, validated via buy_confidence)
Catalyst
7.5/10data confidence 100%| Component | Sub-score |
|---|---|
| erm | 5.0 |
| earnings history | 10.0 |
| earnings timing | 5.0 |
| surprise avg | 10.0 |
- ▸Strong earnings: 3B/0M
How the verdict was assembled
Engine trigger
Quality below minimum threshold.
Engine technical detail
verdict_path:
L1:HARD_BLOCKPassed (7)
- ASYMMETRY:2.5>=1.5
- INSIDER:OK
- 8K:CLEAN
- NEWS_EVENTS:NONE_RECENT
- EARNINGS_PROXIMITY:28d clear
- SEMI_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
- MATERIALS_CYCLE_PEAK:CLEAR
Failed (1)
- MOMENTUM:3.4<4.5
Warning (0)
none
Reward-to-Risk
2.47
Upside
+14.3%
Downside
5.8%
Sizing output
AVOID
Setup— — No clear chart pattern; technical signals are mixed
EdgeCatalyst-Driven — Earnings in 28d with 3/4 beat streak
SuitabilityAggressive — MCap $0.4B<$5B
Investment implication
The L1 gate blocked the positive-verdict path: a hard-floor threshold was breached, so dimensional pillars — including Value at 9.0 could not lift the engine output above the verdict floor. Failed gate signal: MOMENTUM:3.4<4.5.
The strongest dimensions are Value at 9.0, Technical at 8.4, and Insider at 7.5; the weakest are Quality at 1.7, Momentum at 3.4, and Peer rank at 3.7. The V9 engine flagged 1 failed gate, producing an asymmetric reward-to-risk of 2.47 and an engine sizing output of AVOID.
What would invalidate the thesis
Falsifying conditions — when triggered, the corresponding pillar's thesis is invalidated.
- P1Quality Below Floor Exit Signal
Trip ifQuality score rises above 4.0 from the current 1.7.
- P2Momentum Gate Failed
Trip ifMomentum score rises above 4.5 from the current 3.1.
- P3Earnings Beat Streak After Inline Start
Trip ifEarnings surprise falls below 0% (a miss) in the next reported quarter.
- P4Institutional Reach Caps Sizing
Trip ifMarket capitalization exceeds $0.8 billion, double the currently cited $0.4 billion level.
- P5Elevated Leverage And Beta Risk
Trip ifDebt-to-equity risk component falls below 5.0 from the current 9.3.